青海湖流域生态补偿空间选择与补偿标准研究

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2013.0059

冰川冻土 ›› 2013, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 496-503.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2013.0059

• 生态经济与可持续发展 • 上一篇下一篇

青海湖流域生态补偿空间选择与补偿标准研究

宋晓谕¹, 徐中民¹, 祁元¹, 尹小娟¹, 葛劲松²

1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 青海省生态环境遥感监测中心, 青海西宁 810000

收稿日期:2012-10-08 修回日期:2013-02-11 出版日期:2013-04-25 发布日期:2013-05-14
作者简介:宋晓谕(1984-), 男, 甘肃兰州人, 2010年在兰州大学获硕士学位, 现为中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所在读博士研究生, 主要从事生态经济方面的研究. E-mail: song9901@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(91125019)资助

Study of Spatial Target and Compensation Standard of Eco-compensation in Qinghai Lake Watershed

SONG Xiao-yu¹, XU Zhong-min¹, QI Yuan¹, YIN Xiao-juan¹, GE Jin-song²

1. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou Gansu730000, China;
2. Qinghai Ecological and Environmental Remote Sensing Monitor Center, Xining Qinghai 810000, China

Received:2012-10-08 Revised:2013-02-11 Online:2013-04-25 Published:2013-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态补偿是环境保护对策措施中的一种创新途径.以青海湖流域为研究区域, 以碳蓄积量作为主要生态系统服务目标, 结合人文调查数据和自然模拟结果, 分别采用福利成本法和最小数据方法对研究区生态补偿中的空间选择和补偿标准确定进行了分析.结果表明: 环青海湖四个县的生态补偿效率成本比分别是海晏县0.5353、刚察县0.5398、天峻县0.5549、共和县0.4353.在生态补偿资金有限的情况下, 生态补偿的优先顺序依次是天峻、刚察、海晏, 最后是共和.若海晏县全部低盖度草地退牧则需付费328.5元·hm^-2·a^-1, 可年新增碳固定量1.7×10⁷ kg; 若刚察县全部低盖度草地退牧则需付费250.5元·hm^-2·a^-1, 可年新增碳固定量5.25×10⁷kg; 若天峻县全部低盖度草地退牧则需付费181.5元·hm^-2·a^-1, 可年新增碳固定量18.52×10⁷kg; 若共和县全部低盖度草地退牧则需付费478.5元·hm^-2·a^-1, 可年新增碳固定量2.86×10⁷kg.

关键词: 生态补偿, 空间选择, 补偿标准, 青海湖流域

Abstract:

Eco-compensation is an innovative way to protect environment. It transforms the outside of ecosystem services and non-market value into the inherent power of environment protecting. Taking the Qinghai Lake watershed as a case, the impact of land use change on carbon storage is modeled by natural process model Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach, while supply costs of carbon storage are estimated by social survey. Upon these work, the natural process and economical process are included in an integrated model framework by cost-benefit analysis and minimum data approach to explore the spatial targeting and compensation standard in eco-compensation program. Results of the case study show that the efficiency cost ratios of the four counties in the watershed are: 0.5353 in Haiyan County, 0.5549 in Gangcha County, 0.5549 in Tianjun County and 0.4353 in Gonghe County. Regarding to the efficiency cost ratios, the cost order should be: Tianjun County, Gangcha County, Haiyan County and Gonghe County. To achieve the goal of restoration of grassland, the compensation standard order should be: Haiyan County (328.5 yuan·hm^-2 per year), Gangcha County (250.5 yuan·hm^-2 per year), Tianjun County (181.5 yuan·hm^-2 per year) and Gonghe County (478.5 yuan·hm^-2 per year). According to the compensation standard, the carbon storage will increase in all counties of the watershed as follows: 1.7×10⁷ kg per year in Haiyan County, 5.25×10⁷ kg per year in Gangcha County, 18.52×10⁷ kg per year in Tianjun County and 2.86×10⁷kg per year in Gonghe County.

Key words: eco-compensation, spatial target, compensation standard, Qianghai Lake watershed

中图分类号:

F062.2

宋晓谕, 徐中民, 祁元, 尹小娟, 葛劲松. 青海湖流域生态补偿空间选择与补偿标准研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2): 496-503.

SONG Xiao-yu, XU Zhong-min, QI Yuan, YIN Xiao-juan, GE Jin-song. Study of Spatial Target and Compensation Standard of Eco-compensation in Qinghai Lake Watershed[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2013, 35(2): 496-503.

参考文献

[1] Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4): 663-674.

[2] Xu Zhongmin, Zhong Fanglei, Zhao Xueyan, et al. The research progress of ecological compensation [J]. Research of Finance and Accounting, 2008(23): 67-72, 80.

[3] Xu Zhongmin,Cheng Guodong. Holistic viewpoint in the ecological economics[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2011,33(3):668-675. [徐中民,程国栋. 生态经济研究中的整体性视角[J]. 冰川冻土, 2011,33(3):668-675.]

[4] Kemkes R J, Farley J, Koliba C J. Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem[J]. Ecological Economics,2010, 69(11):2069-2074.

[5] Shang Haiyang, Su Fang, Xu Zhongmin, et al. A review of the eco-compensation study [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2011,33(6):1435-1443. [尚海洋,苏芳,徐中民,等. 生态补偿的研究进展及其启示[J]. 冰川冻土,2011,33(6):1435-1443.]

[6] Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries [J]. Ecological Economic, 2008, 65(4):834-852.

[7] Wünscher T, Engel S, Wunder S. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(3): 822-833.

[8] Babcock B A, Lakshminarayan P G, Wu J, et al. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities[J]. Land Economics, 1997, 73(3):325-339.

[9] Daly H E, Farley J. Ecological Economics: Principle and Applications [M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2003.

[10] Li Xiaoguang, Miao Hong, Deng Hua, et al. Main methods for setting ecological compensation standard and their application[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(8): 4431-4440.[李晓光,苗鸿,邓华,等. 生态补偿标准确定的主要方法及应用[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(8): 4431-4440.]

[11] Antle J M, Valdivia R O. Modeling the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture: a minimum data approach[J]. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2006, 50(1): 1-15.

[12] Tang Zeng, Xu Zhongmin, Wu Cuifang, et al. Determination of the eco-compensation criteria: An application of the minimal method in Minqin, Gansu [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2010,32(5):1044-1048. [唐增,徐中民,武翠芳,等. 生态补偿标准的确定——最小数据法及其在民勤的应用[J]. 冰川冻土,2010,32(5):1044-1048.]

[13] Li Hongmei, Ma Yushou, Bai Yanfang. An analysis of the impact of climate change on vegetation succession in Qinghai Province [J].Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2010,32(2):414-421. [李红梅,马玉寿,白彦芳. 气候变化对青海高原植被演变的影响分析[J].冰川冻土,2010,32(2):414-421.]

[14] Wang Qingchun, Shi Xinghe, Liu Yihua, et al. Relationship between tree ring indices and vegetation index(NDVI) in Buha River basin, Qinghai[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2012,34(6): 1424-1432. [汪青春,时兴合,刘义花,等. 青海湖布哈河流域树轮宽度指数与NDVI植被指数的关系[J]. 冰川冻土,2012,34(6):1424-1432.]

[15] Wang Jian, Qi Yuan, Chen Zhenghua, et al. Modeling dynamic assessment on ecosystem services based on remote sensing technology——A case study on Gansu grassland ecosystem[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2006, 28(5):739-747. [王建,祁元,陈正华,等. 基于遥感技术的生态系统服务价值动态评估模型研究[J].冰川冻土, 2006, 28(5):739-747.]

[16] Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B, et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data [J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993, 7: 811-841.

[17] Field C B, Behrenfeld M J, Randerson J T, et al. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components [J]. Science, 1998, 281: 237-240.

青海湖流域生态补偿空间选择与补偿标准研究

Study of Spatial Target and Compensation Standard of Eco-compensation in Qinghai Lake Watershed

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	尚海洋, 丁杨, 宋妮妮. 影响流域生态补偿中生态工人创新机制的因素分析——以石羊河流域为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(6): 1357-1364.
[2]	王涛, 高峰, 王宝, 王鹏龙, 王勤花, 宋华龙, 尹常亮. 祁连山生态保护与修复的现状问题与建议[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(2): 229-234.
[3]	苏芳. 多种生态补偿方案下流域农户生计的响应机制[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(6): 1591-1598.
[4]	蔡国英, 尹小娟, 赵继荣 . 青海湖流域人类福祉认知及综合评价[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(2): 469-478.
[5]	郑中, 祁元, 潘小多, 葛劲松, 聂学敏. 基于WRF模式数据和CASA模型的青海湖流域草地NPP估算研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2): 465-474.
[6]	尚海洋, 苏芳. 生态补偿方式对农户生计资本的影响分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(4): 983-989.
[7]	张娟, 沙占江, 王静慧, 祁永发, 陈晓琴, 宋昌斌. 基于遥感和GIS的青海湖流域冻融侵蚀研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, (2): 375-381.
[8]	张丽, 赵雪雁, 侯成成, 江进德. 生态补偿对农户生计资本的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(1): 186-195.
[9]	唐增;刘建国. 生态补偿标准的确定—最小数据法及其在民勤的初步应用[J]. 冰川冻土, 2010, 32(5): 1044-1048.
[10]	赵雪雁;;董霞;范君君;戴其文. 甘南黄河水源补给区生态补偿方式的选择 [J]. 冰川冻土, 2010, 32(1): 204-210.