生态建设政策交易成本及其结构的比较

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2013.0145

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将交易成本分析引入沙漠化地区生态建设政策分析过程, 确定交易成本由搜寻信息成本、签订合约成本、建设及营运成本、监督对方是否违约成本、违约后寻求赔偿成本共5部分构成. 每个部分根据研究区域生态政策实施的关键节点进行指标分解, 设计政策交易成本分析的21个指标. 为了将不同生态政策之间的绩效进行对比, 构造了交易成本结构指数, 它由内生交易成本占总交易成本的比重、农户投入占生态建设项目生产成本的比重、交易成本占生态建设项目交易成本与生产成本之和的比重共3个指标构成. 根据在宁夏盐池县的调研数据, 测算退耕还林政策和天然林保护政策的交易成本分别为640.87元·hm^-2·a^-1和41.49元·hm^-2·a^-1, 交易成本结构指数值分别为0.1242和0.2292, 实施效果分别是很好和较好;"三北"防护林政策的交易成本为806.08元·hm^-2·a^-1, 交易成本结构指数值为0.4149, 实施效果一般;草地禁牧政策的交易成本为530.45元·hm^-2·a^-1, 交易成本结构指数值为0.8575, 实施效果很差. 生态政策的交易成本及其结构分析, 将为不同生态建设政策的比较和绩效评价提供一个新的角度, 具有重要意义.

关键词: 生态建设政策, 交易成本, 交易成本结构指数, 绩效评价

Abstract: In this paper, transaction cost analysis is introduced into ecological construction policy analysis process in desertification regions, and five costs are defined as transaction costs, which are information search cost, contract signing cost, construction and operating cost, supervision cost and seeking compensation cost, respectively. For each part, index decomposition is done according to the key nodes of the implementation of regional ecological policy and a total of 21 indexes of policy transaction cost analysis are designed. A transaction cost structure index is constructed in order to compare the performance between different ecological policies. The transaction cost structure index is constituted by three norms: the ratio of endogenous transaction cost to the total transaction cost, the ratio of farm inputs to the production cost of ecological construction projects, and the ratio of transaction cost to the sum of production cost and transaction cost of ecological construction projects. According to an investigation in Yanchi County, it is revealed that Return the Grain Plots to Forestry and Natural Forest Protection policy have good and relatively good implementation effects with transaction costs of 640.87 yuan·hm^-2·a^-1 and 41.49 yuan·hm^-2·a^-1 and transaction cost structure indexes of 0.1242 and 0.2292, respectively;the "Three-North" Shelterbelt policy has a general effect and its transaction cost is 806.08 yuan·hm^-2·a^-1 and transaction cost structure index is 0.4149;Grassland Grazing Prohibition policy has poor effect with transaction cost of 530.45 yuan·hm^-2·a^-1 and transaction cost structure index of 0.8575. Transaction cost and structure analysis of ecological policy is of great significance, providing a new perspective for comparison and performance evaluation of different ecological construction policies.

Key words: ecological construction policy, transaction cost, transaction cost structure index, performance evaluation

中图分类号:

F062.2

樊胜岳, 兰健, 徐均, 陈玉玲. 生态建设政策交易成本及其结构的比较[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(5): 1283-1291.

FAN Sheng-yue, LAN Jian, XU Jun, CHEN Yu-ling. A Comparison Between Transaction Cost and Structure of Ecological Construction Policies[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2013, 35(5): 1283-1291.

参考文献

[1] Task Force on Eco-Compensation Mechanisms and Policies, CCICED. umrat Ibrayim, et al. Yu Zhengwei. Public policy, transaction cost and governance mechanism: Exploring transaction cost in public policy studies[J]. Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2009(9): 46-50;73. [于正伟. 公共政策、交易成本与治理机制——公共政策研究中的交易成本视角探析[J]. 常熟理工学院学报(哲学社会科学), 2009(9): 46-50;73.]
[10] Liu Xitian. Institutional innovation in transaction cost theory and its development[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2006(1): 24-26. [刘锡田. 制度创新中的交易成本理论及其发展[J]. 当代财经, 2006(1): 24-26.]
[11] Hu Shuguang, Chen Qijie. A comparative study on the efficiency of institution and the transaction institutions[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2002, 28(10): 49-55. [胡曙光, 陈启杰. 制度效率与交易制度比较研究[J]. 财经研究, 2002, 28(10): 49-55.]
[12] Soloman B. New directions in emission trading: The potential contribution of new institutional economics[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 30: 371-387.
[13] Colby B G. Transaction costs and efficiency in western water allocation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1990, 72: 1184-1192.
[14] McCann L, Easter K W. Transaction costs of policies to reduce agricultural phosphorous pollution in the Minnesota River[J]. Land Economics, 1997, 75(3): 402-414.
[15] Shen Manhong. On dealing in water right and cost of dealing[J]. Yellow River, 2004, 26(7): 19-22. [沈满洪. 论水权交易与交易成本[J]. 人民黄河, 2004, 26(7): 19-22.]
[16] Fan Shengyue, Wu Riga, Zhao Danhua, et al. Transaction cost analysis of implementation process of ecology construction policy in sandy desertification areas[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2012, 35(5): 815-821. [樊胜岳, 乌日嘎, 赵丹华, 等. 沙漠化地区生态建设政策执行过程中的交易成本分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(5): 815-821.]
[17] Fan Shengyue, Xu Yucai, Duan Shuangquan, et al. Measurement of transaction cost of rest-grazing policy[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(9): 1248-1253. [樊胜岳, 徐裕财, 段双全, 等. 草地休牧政策交易成本测算研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(9): 1248-1253.]
[18] Coase R H. The nature of the firm[J]. Economica, 1937, 4(16): 386-405.
[19] Williamson O E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Fir-ms, Markets, Relational Contracting[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
[20] Furubotn E G, Richter R. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics[M]. Jiang Jianqiang, Luo Changyuan, trans. Shanghai: Truth & Wisdom Press, 2006: 67-82. [埃里克·弗鲁博顿, 鲁道夫·芮切特. 新制度经济学: 一个交易费用分析范式[M]. 姜建强, 罗长远, 译. 上海: 格致出版社, 2006: 67-82.]
[21] Lu Xianxiang, Zhu Qiaoling. New Institutional Economics[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012: 84;163-168. [卢现祥, 朱巧玲. 新制度经济学[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012: 84;163-168.]
[22] Zhang Jihua. The meaning of the theory of transaction cost theory, function and enlightenment[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2007(3): 12-16. [张计划. 论交易费用的涵义、功能与理论启示[J]. 当代财经, 2007(3): 12-16.]
[23] Kong Xiangzhi. The Economic Survey of Chinese Peasant Family[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Technology Press, 1999. [孔祥智. 中国农家经济审视[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999.]
[24] Hu Jilian. The Economic Behavior Research of the Chinese Peasant[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 1992. [胡继连. 中国农户经济行为研究[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992.]
[25] Han Yao. The produced behavior research of the Chinese peasant[J]. Economic Review, 1995(5): 29-33. [韩耀. 中国农户生产行为研究[J]. 经济纵横, 1995(5): 29-33.]
[26] Fan Shengyue, Ma Limei. Performance evaluation study of ecology rehabilitation policy based on households[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2008, 31(4): 572-579. [樊胜岳, 马丽梅. 基于农户的生态建设政策绩效评价研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2008, 31(4): 572-579.]
[27] Fan Shengyue, Ma Yonghuan, Zhou Lihua. Response of hou-seholds to eco-environment control policy in Minqin in recent years[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2005, 25(3): 397-403. [樊胜岳, 马永欢, 周立华. 甘肃民勤绿洲近年来生态治理政策在农户中的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(3): 397-403.]
[28] Shang Haiyang, Su Fang. Impact of the ecological compensation pattern on livelihood capital of farmers[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2012, 34(4): 983-989. [尚海洋, 苏芳. 生态补偿方式对农户生计资本的影响分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(4): 983-989.]
[29] Zhang Li, Zhao Xueyan, Hou Chengcheng, et al. Effect of ecological compensation on farmer household livelihood capital-a case study in the Yellow River water supply area in Gannan[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2012, 34(1): 186-195. [张丽, 赵雪雁, 侯成成, 等. 生态补偿对农户生计资本的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(1): 186-195.]
[30] Fang Fuqian. Public Choice Theory—Political Economics[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2000. [方福前. 公共选择理论——政治的经济学[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2000.]
[31] Chai Haofang, Li Qingxia, Fu Rong, et al. The impasse of grazing-ban policy and the future of pasture management[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2009(1): 93-98;112. [柴浩放, 李青夏, 傅荣, 等. 禁牧政策僵局的演化及政策暗示: 基于宁夏盐池农村观察[J]. 农业经济问题, 2009(1): 93-98;112.]
[32] Qi Gubo, Hu Xinping. Research of the grazing behavior under the grazing ban policy—the research case of Yanchi County in Ningxia[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2006(2): 12-16. [齐顾波, 胡新萍. 草场禁牧政策下的农民放牧行为研究——以宁夏盐池县的调查为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(2): 12-16.]