青海湖流域人类福祉认知及综合评价

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2014.0057

冰川冻土 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 469-478.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2014.0057

• 生态经济与可持续发展 • 上一篇

青海湖流域人类福祉认知及综合评价

蔡国英¹, 尹小娟¹, 赵继荣²

1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所内陆河流域生态水文重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 兰州文理学院, 甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2013-09-11 修回日期:2013-12-09 出版日期:2014-04-25 发布日期:2014-05-20
作者简介:蔡国英（1978-），女，甘肃白银人，2006年在兰州大学获硕士学位，现为中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所在读博士研究生，主要从事生态经济学研究. E-mail：caigy1121@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（91125019）资助

Recognition and comprehensive evaluation of human well-being in Qinghai Lake basin

CAI Guoying¹, YIN Xiaojuan¹, ZHAO Jirong²

1. Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Lanzhou University of Arts and Science, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2013-09-11 Revised:2013-12-09 Online:2014-04-25 Published:2014-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 千年生态系统评估（MA）是全球范围内第一个针对人类福祉与生态系统之间的联系，通过整合各种资源，构建多尺度、综合评估各个组分之间相互关系的重大项目. 以MA框架中对人类福祉的定义为依据，通过参与式农户评估，初步探讨了青海湖流域居民对日常生活满意度的认知，采用多指标评估法综合评估了青海湖流域的人类福祉水平. 结果表明：受年龄、性别、受教育程度等因素的影响，环湖居民对日常生活中的衣、食、住、行、收入等方面的认知程度差别明显；总体来看，青海湖流域人类福祉综合分值仅为0.454，收入状况和食物安全是其最主要的影响因素，对人类福祉的贡献值分别为0.074和0.147；分县域而言，共和县人类福祉得分最高，为0.483，海晏县略低，其次是天峻县，刚察县得分最低，仅为0.448. 收入状况和食物安全也是制约分县域居民福祉的关键因素. 因此，改善青海湖流域居民家庭层面的物质资产是提高其福祉的有效途径.

关键词: 青海湖流域, 人类福祉, 多指标评价

Abstract: Millennium ecosystem assessment (MA) is the first international work program designed to assess the interactions between ecosystems and human well-being based on the information from all sources and to establish an analytical approach to conduct multi-scale and integrated assessments. In this paper, based on the definition of human well-being in the MA framework, the recognition of daily life satisfaction and the comprehensive multi-indexes evaluation of human well-being are applied to the local people living in Qinghai Lake basin. Data were collected by a questionnaire survey in conjunction with the participatory rural appraisal (PRA) method. It is found that the recognition of local people's daily life (such as clothing, food, housing and income) in the study area were obvious differences, dependent on age, sexuality, level of education and so on. Based on the multi-index evaluation method consisting of material indicators and subjective satisfaction, the status and spatial difference in human well-being were analyzed. On the whole, the human well-being score in Qinghai Lake basin was only 0.454, income and food security were the most important factors from the local people's view, with the contribution values as high as 0.074 and 0.147. On the sub-regional perspective, the human well-being score of Gonghe County was the highest, followed by Haiyan County, Tianjun County. The human well-being of Gangcha County had the lowest score, only 0.448. In summary, increasing income and ensuring food safety are the effective way for improving the human well-being in Qinghai Lake basin.

Key words: Qinghai Lake basin, human well-being, multi-index evaluation

中图分类号:

F062.2

蔡国英, 尹小娟, 赵继荣 . 青海湖流域人类福祉认知及综合评价[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(2): 469-478.

CAI Guoying, YIN Xiaojuan, ZHAO Jirong. Recognition and comprehensive evaluation of human well-being in Qinghai Lake basin[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2014, 36(2): 469-478.

参考文献

[1] van den Doel H, van Velthoven B. Democracy and Welfare Economics[M]. Chen Gang, Shen Huashan, Wu Zhiming, et al. trans. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 1999: 56-121.
[2] Pigou A C. The Economics of Welfare[M]. Jin Di, trans. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2007: 34-85.
[3] Zheng Wei, Shi Honghua, Chen Shang, et al. Perception to ecosystem service function on the view point of welfare economics[J]. Ecological Economy, 2006(6): 78-81.
[4] Li Yan, Li Shuangcheng, Gao Yang, et al. Ecosystem services and hierarchic human well-being: Concepts and service classification framework[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047. [李琰, 李双成, 高阳, 等. 连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047.]
[5] Alcamo J, Bennett E M. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment[M]. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2003: 58-101.
[6] Zhao Shidong, Zhang Yongmin. Concepts, contents and challenges of ecosystem assessment-Introduction to "Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment"[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2004, 19(4): 650-657. [赵士洞, 张永民. 生态系统评估的概念、内涵及挑战——介绍《生态系统与人类福利: 评估框架》[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(4): 650-657.]
[7] Zhao Shidong, Zhang Yongmin. Ecosystems and human well-being: The achievements, contributions and prospects of the millennium ecosystem assessment[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2006, 21(9): 895-902. [赵士洞, 张永民. 生态系统与人类福祉——千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(9): 895-902.]
[8] Zheng Zhong, Qi Yuan, Pan Xiaoduo, et al. Estimating the grassland NPP in Qinghai Lake basin based on WRF model data and CASA model[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2013, 35(2): 465-474. [郑中, 祁元, 潘小多, 等. 基于WRF模式数据和CASA模型的青海湖流域草地NPP估算研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2): 465-474.]
[9] Zhang Juan, Sha Zhanjiang, Wang Jinghui, et al. Freezing-thawing erosion in the Qinghai Lake basin based on remote sensing and GIS[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2012, 34(2): 375-381. [张娟, 沙占江, 王静慧, 等. 基于遥感和GIS的青海湖流域冻融侵蚀研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(2): 375-381.]
[10] Song Xiaoyu, Xu Zhongmin, Qi Yuan, et al. Study of spatial target and compensation standard of eco-compensation in Qinghai Lake watershed[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2013, 35(2): 496-503. [宋晓谕, 徐中民, 祁元, 等. 青海湖流域生态补偿空间选择与补偿标准研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2): 496-503.]
[11] Feng Weilin, Li Shuzhuo, Li Cong. Overview and frame work for ecosystem services and human well-being[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(7): 1482-1489. [冯伟林, 李树茁, 李聪. 生态系统服务与人类福祉——文献综述与分析框架[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(7): 1482-1489.]
[12] Dai Guangshuo, Yu Baohua, Narisu, et al. Preliminary studies on ecosystem services and human well-being in grassland of Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(5): 656-662. [代光烁, 余宝花, 娜日苏, 等. 内蒙古草原生态系统服务与人类福祉研究初探[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(5): 656-662.]
[13] Li Huimei, Zhang Anlu. Ecological protection and well-being[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 825-833. [李惠梅, 张安录. 生态环境保护与福祉[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 825-833.]
[14] Dodds S. Towards a 'science of sustainability’: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being[J]. Ecological Economics, 1997, 23(2): 95-111.
[15] Vemuri A W, Costanza R. The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a National Well-Being Index (NWI)[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58(1): 119-133.
[16] Coulthard S, Johnson D, McGregor J A. Poverty, sustainability and human wellbeing: A social wellbeing approach to the global fisheries crisis[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2011, 21(2): 453-463.
[17] Cummins R A, Eckersley R, Lo S K, et al. The Australian unity wellbeing index: An overview[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2003, 76: 1-4.
[18] Hall J, Giovannini E, Morrone A, et al. A Framework to Measure the Progress of Societies, Statistics Directorate Working Paper No. 34[R].[S.l.]: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2010.
[19] Zhang Zhi, Zhu Qingke, Zhu Jinzhao, et al. Application of participatory rural appraisal in watershed landscape pattern: A case study of Caijiachuan watershed, the Loess Plateau of western Shanxi Province[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 3(1): 25-31. [张志, 朱清科, 朱金兆, 等. 参与式农村评估(PRA)在流域景观格局研究中的应用——以晋西黄土区吉县蔡家川为例[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2005, 3(1): 25-31.]
[20] Liao Yujing, Song Changchun, Guo Yuedong, et al. Responses of farmers to wetland ecosystem stability and grain-for-wetland program based on participatory rural appraisal[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(6): 1041-1048. [廖玉静, 宋长春, 郭跃东, 等. 基于PRA方法的社区居民对湿地生态系统稳定性及退耕政策的认知分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(6): 1041-1048.]
[21] Costanza R, Fisher B, Ali S, et al. Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(2/3): 267-276.
[22] Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong. Holistic viewpoint in the ecological economics[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2011, 33(3): 668-675. [徐中民, 程国栋. 生态经济研究中的整体性视角[J]. 冰川冻土, 2011, 33(3): 668-675.]
[23] Yang Li, Zhen Lin, Li Fen, et al. Impacts of ecosystem services change on human well-being in the Loess Plateau[J]. Resources Science, 2010, 32(5): 849-855. [杨莉, 甄霖, 李芬, 等. 黄土高原生态系统服务变化对人类福祉的影响初探[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(5): 849-855.]
[24] Yu Xiaofen, Fu Dai. Survey on the multi-index comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2004(11): 119-121.
[25] Wang Dashang, Zheng Hua, Ouyang Zhiyun. Ecosystem services supply and consumption and their relationships with human well-being[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(6): 1747-1753. [王大尚, 郑华, 欧阳志云. 生态系统服务供给、消费与人类福祉的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(6): 1747-1753.]
[26] Cheng Huaiwen, Xu Zhongmin, Li Yuwen. Applying happy life-expectamce to appraise the development status of different areas within the Heihe River basin[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2011, 33(3): 676-682. [程怀文, 徐中民, 李玉文. 基于幸福生活预期评价黑河流域各地社会发展[J]. 冰川冻土, 2011, 33(3): 676-682.]
[27] Zhang Li, Zhao Xueyan, Hou Chengcheng, et al. Effect of ecological compensation on farmer-household livelihood capital-A case study in the Yellow River water supply area in Gannan[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2012, 34(1): 186-195. [张丽, 赵雪雁, 侯成成, 等. 生态补偿对农户生计资本的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(1): 186-195.]

青海湖流域人类福祉认知及综合评价

Recognition and comprehensive evaluation of human well-being in Qinghai Lake basin

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	宋晓谕, 徐中民, 祁元, 尹小娟, 葛劲松. 青海湖流域生态补偿空间选择与补偿标准研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2): 496-503.
[2]	郑中, 祁元, 潘小多, 葛劲松, 聂学敏. 基于WRF模式数据和CASA模型的青海湖流域草地NPP估算研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2): 465-474.
[3]	张娟, 沙占江, 王静慧, 祁永发, 陈晓琴, 宋昌斌. 基于遥感和GIS的青海湖流域冻融侵蚀研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, (2): 375-381.