两种数值模式资料的平均海平面气压和地面风速在中国区域的评估

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2015.0166

冰川冻土 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1497-1507.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2015.0166

两种数值模式资料的平均海平面气压和地面风速在中国区域的评估

龚伟伟¹, 师春香², 张涛², 孟现勇³

1. 南京信息工程大学, 江苏南京 210044;
2. 国家气象信息中心, 北京 100081;
3. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2015-09-23 修回日期:2015-11-12 出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2016-05-11
通讯作者: 师春香,E-mail:shicx@cma.gov.cn. E-mail:shicx@cma.gov.cn
作者简介:龚伟伟(1987-),女,江苏南通人,2014年毕业于南京信息工程大学,主要从事陆面数据同化研究.E-mail:nuist_gongweiwei@163.com
基金资助:
国家国际科技合作项目(2011DFG23150);国家公益性行业专项(GYHY201306045;国家自然科学基金项目(91437220)资助

Evaluating the mean sea level pressure and surface wind speed in China derived from two numerical model data

GONG Weiwei¹, SHI Chunxiang², ZHANG Tao², MENG Xianyong³

1. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
2. National Meteorological Information Center, CMA, Beijing 100081, China;
3. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Vrümqi, 830011, China

Received:2015-09-23 Revised:2015-11-12 Online:2015-12-25 Published:2016-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用中国气象局国家级自动站(2 421个)的观测资料, 分别对2012年的ECMWF(欧洲中期数值预报中心)和JMA(日本气象厅)数值模式资料的平均海平面气压和地面风速在中国地区的适用性进行了对比研究.结果表明:两种数值模式资料均能在一定程度上反映观测资料所具有的时空分布特征, 东部地区的适用性均要高于西部地区. 对于平均海平面气压, 在西南地区JMA比ECMWF资料更接近实际观测; 而在其他地区, 两种数值模式资料都较接近实际观测, 冬季的结果比夏季好. 对于地面风速, 这两种数值模式资料各具优势.在中国东南部地区, JMA相对于ECMWF的地面风速资料更接近实际观测值, 而在中国西部地区, 则相反.就8个时次的年变化而言, ECMWF资料的年变化趋势与观测资料更为一致, 而JMA资料的地面风速大小与观测资料更为接近.

关键词: ECMWF, JMA, 平均海平面气压, 地面风速, 适用性评估

Abstract: Applicability of mean sea level pressure and surface wind speed from ECMWF and JMA data is evaluated in China by comparison with 2 421 automatic station observations from Chinese Meteorological Administration for the periods of 2012. The results indicate that the two numerical models (ECMWF and JMA) could display spatiotemporal consistence with observation basically. The performance of numerical models in east of China is more reliable than that in west of China. The mean sea level pressure from JMA is closer to the observation than that from CMWF in the Southwest China. In other regions of China, results from both ECMWF and JMA are rather close to the observation. The quality of mean sea level pressure from both ECMWF and JMA is better in winter than that in summer. For surface wind speed, result from JMA is better than that from ECMWF in the Southeast China, but it is opposite in other areas. As regard to annual trend, result from ECMWF agrees with the observation very well. However, for surface wind speed, result from JMA is closer to the observation than that from ECMWF.

Key words: ECMWF, JMA, mean sea level pressure, surface wind speed, applicability evaluation

中图分类号:

P424.2

龚伟伟, 师春香, 张涛, 孟现勇. 两种数值模式资料的平均海平面气压和地面风速在中国区域的评估[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(6): 1497-1507.

GONG Weiwei, SHI Chunxiang, ZHANG Tao, MENG Xianyong. Evaluating the mean sea level pressure and surface wind speed in China derived from two numerical model data[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2015, 37(6): 1497-1507.

参考文献

[1] Zhao Qiudong, Ye Bosheng, Ding yongjian, et al. Hydrological process of a typical catchment in cold region:Simulation and analysis[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2011, 33(3):595-605.[赵求东, 叶柏生, 丁永建, 等. 典型寒区流域水文过程模拟及分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2011, 33(3):595-605.]
[2] Meng Xianyong, Liu Zhihui, Li Chengzhi, et al. Sandy desertification early-warning model based on a 30 m×30 m grid scale:A case study on middle section of the lower reaches of Tarim River[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2013, 33(1):24-32.[孟现勇, 刘志辉, 李诚志, 等. 基于栅格尺度的沙漠化预警模型研究——以塔里木河下游中段区域为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(1):24-32.]
[3] Li Shuai, Wang Ping, Chen Li, et al. Variation features and prediction of the topsoil (0~20 cm) ground temperature of spring in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(1):55-62.[李帅, 王萍, 陈莉, 等. 黑龙江省春季浅层(0~20 cm)地温变化特征及预报[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(1):55-62.]
[4] Sun Yue, Li Dongliang. Features and response to climate-driven factors of runoff in the upper reaches of the Weihe River during 1975-2011[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(2):413-423.[孙悦, 李栋梁. 1975-2011年渭河上游径流演变规律及对气候驱动因子的响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(2):413-423.]
[5] Liu Jinting. Study of multiple forcing driving multiple land surface model over Xinjiang and result integration[D]. Qingdao:Ocean University of China, 2010.[刘金婷. 多陆面模式、多驱动场对新疆地区陆面过程模拟研究及结果集成[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学, 2010.]
[6] Li Xin, Huang Chunlin, Che Tao, et al. Progress and prospect on Chinese land data assimilation system[J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2007, 17(2):163-173.[李新, 黄春林, 车涛, 等. 中国陆面数据同化系统研究的进展与前瞻[J]. 自然科学进展, 2007, 17(2):163-173.]
[7] Maurer E P, Wood A W, Adam J C, et al. A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States[J]. Journal of climate, 2002, 15(22):3237-3251.
[8] Berg A A, Famiglietti J S, Walker J P, et al. Impact of bias correction to reanalysis products on simulations of North American soil moisture and hydrological fluxes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2003, 108(D16).
[9] Fekete B M, V r smarty C J, Roads J O, et al. Uncertainties in precipitation and their impacts on runoff estimates[J]. Journal of Climate, 2004, 17(2):294-304.
[10] Sheffield J, Ziegler A D, Wood E F, et al. Correction of the high-latitude rain day anomaly in the NCEP-NCAR reanalysis for land surface hydrological modeling[J]. Journal of Climate, 2004, 17(19):3814-3828.
[11] Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project[J]. Bulletin of the American meteorological Society, 1996, 77(3):437-471.
[12] Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, et al. Ncep-doe amip-ii reanalysis (r-2)[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2002, 83(11):1631-1643.
[13] Uppala S M, K llberg P W, Simmons A J, et al. The ERA-40 re-analysis[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2005, 131(612):2961-3012.
[14] Onogi K, Tsutsui J, Koide H, et al. The JRA-25 reanalysis[J]. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 2007, 85(3):369-432.
[15] Sheffield J, Goteti G, Wood E F. Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forgings for land surface modeling[J]. Journal of Climate, 2006, 19(13):3088-3111.
[16] Qian Taotao, Dai Aiguo, Trenberth K E, et al. Simulation of global land surface conditions from 1948 to 2004. Part I:Forcing data and evaluations[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2006, 7(5):953-975.
[17] Chen Yingying, Yang Kun, He Jie, et al. Improving land surface temperature modeling for dry land of China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2011, 116(D20).
[18] Shi Chunxiang, Xie Zhenghui, Qian Hui, et al. China land soil moisture EnKF data assimilation based on satellite remote sensing data[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2011, 54(9):1430-1440.
[19] Zhao Tianbao, Ailikun, Feng Jinming. An intercomparison between NCEP reanalysis and observed data over China[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2004, 9(2):278-294.[赵天保, 艾丽坤, 冯锦明. NCEP再分析资料和中国站点观测资料的分析与比较[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2004, 9(2):278-294.]
[20] Zhao Tianbao, Fu Congbin. Preliminary Comparison and Analysis between ERA-40, NCEP-2 Reanalysis and Observations over China[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2006, 11(1):15-33.[赵天保, 符淙斌. 中国区域ERA-40、NCEP-2再分析资料与观测资料的初步比较与分析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2006, 11(1):15-33.]
[21] Zhao Tianbao, Hua Lijuan. Applicability evaluation of surface pressure for several reanalysis dataset over China[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2009, 20(1):70-79.[赵天保, 华丽娟. 几种再分析地表气压资料在中国区域的适应性评估[J]. 应用气象学报, 2009, 20(1):70-79.]
[22] Zhao Tianbao, Fu Congbin. Applicability evaluation of air temperature form several reanalysis dataset in China[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2009, 28(3):595-607.[赵天保, 符淙斌. 几种再分析地表气温资料在中国区域的用性评估[J]. 高原气象, 2009, 28(3):595-607.]
[23] Shi Xiaohui, Xu Xiangde, Ding Yihui. Reliability analyses of anomalies of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis wind speed and surface temperature in climate change research in China[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2006, 64(6):709-713.[施晓晖, 徐祥德, 谢立安. NCEP/NCAR再分析风速、表面气温距平在中国区域气候变化研究中的可信度分析[J]. 气象学报, 2006, 64(6):709-713.]
[24] Xu Ying, Ding Yihui, Zhao Zongci. Confidence analysis of NCEP/NCAR 50-year global reanalyzed data in climate change research in China[J]. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2001, 12(3):337-347.[徐影, 丁一汇, 赵宗慈. 美国NCEP/NCAR近50年全球再分析资料在我国气候变化研究中可信度的初步分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 2001, 12(3):337-347.]
[25] Su Zhixia, Lu shihua, Luo SiWei. The examinations and analysis of NCEP/NCAR 40 years global reanalysis data in China[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 1999, 18(2):209-219.[苏志侠, 吕世华, 罗四维. 美国NCEP/NCAR全球再分析资料及其初步分析[J]. 高原气象, 1999, 18(2):209-219.]
[26] Li Baiping, Zhi Xiefei. Comparative study of four correction schemes of the ECMWF surface temperature forecasts[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2012, 38(8):897-902.[李佰平, 智协飞. ECMWF模式地面气温预报的四种误差订正方法的比较研究[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(8):897-902.]
[27] Song Chaohui. A simple method to calculate the mean sea level pressure[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 1984(11):29-30.[宋超辉. 计算平均海平面气压的简便方法[J]. 气象, 1984(11):29-30.]

两种数值模式资料的平均海平面气压和地面风速在中国区域的评估

Evaluating the mean sea level pressure and surface wind speed in China derived from two numerical model data

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 9