牧压梯度下海北高寒草甸土壤速效氮变化特征及其影响因素分析

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2015.0183

冰川冻土 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1660-1669.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2015.0183

牧压梯度下海北高寒草甸土壤速效氮变化特征及其影响因素分析

祝景彬^{1 2}, 李红琴^{1 3}, 贺慧丹^{1 3}, 毛绍娟^{1 3}, 李英年^{1 3}

1. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 青海西宁 810001;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 中国科学院高原生物适应与进化重点实验室, 青海西宁 810001

收稿日期:2015-10-27 修回日期:2015-12-05 出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2016-05-11
通讯作者: 李英年,E-mail:ynli@nwipb.ac.cn. E-mail:ynli@nwipb.ac.cn
作者简介:祝景彬(1989-),男,汉族,山东菏泽人,2013年毕业于菏泽学院,现为中国科学院西北高原生物研究所在读硕士研究生,主要从事全球变化生态学研究.E-mail:zhujingbin321@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31270523;31300385);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项A类(XDA05050404-2)资助

Analysis of the variation characteristics and controlling factors of soil rapidly available nitrogen in Haibei alpine meadow under grazing pressure gradient

ZHU Jingbin^{1 2}, LI Hongqin^{1 3}, HE Huidan^{1 3}, MAO Shaojuan^{1 3}, LI Yingnian^{1 3}

1. Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China

Received:2015-10-27 Revised:2015-12-05 Online:2015-12-25 Published:2016-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在青海海北高寒矮嵩草草甸设置封育禁牧(CK)、轻牧(LG)、中牧(MG)和重牧(HG)放牧梯度试验样地, 进行了土壤速效氮变化特征及影响因素的分析. 结果表明: 植物生长期的5-9月, 土壤NH₄⁺-N、NO₃^--N和速效氮(NH₄⁺-N和NO₃^--N之和)含量季节变化明显, 基本表现为植物生长初期高, 末期低. CK、LG、MG和HG条件下, 5-9月0~40 cm土壤NH₄⁺-N平均含量分别为17.62 mg·kg^-1、17.84 mg·kg^-1、18.63 mg·kg^-1和16.67 mg·kg^-1, NO₃^--N平均含量为8.91 mg·kg^-1、8.23 mg·kg^-1、7.99 mg·kg^-1和7.94 mg·kg^-1, 速效氮平均含量为26.53 mg·kg^-1、26.07 mg·kg^-1、26.62 mg·kg^-1和24.61 mg·kg^-1, 基本表现出随放牧强度增大而降低. 土壤速效氮月际变化与地上绿体生物量具有一定的负相关关系, 表明地上生物量越大, 消耗土壤速效氮越趋明显; 与枯落物有一定的正相关关系, 与地下生物量关系不甚明显, 与湿沉降呈现负的相关性. 土壤NH₄⁺-N含量与土壤有机碳有负相关关系, 而NO₃^--N含量与有机碳相关性差, 表明土壤有机碳越高, 土壤NH₄⁺-N消耗越明显.

关键词: 海北高寒草甸, 牧压梯度, 土壤速效氮

Abstract: Variation of soil available nitrogen and its controlling factors in different grazing intensities, including banning grazing (CK), light grazing (LG), moderate grazing (MG) and heavy grazing (HG), were studied in Haibei alpine Kobresia humilis meadow area of Qinghai Province. The following results were obtained: 1)The content of ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen and soil available nitrogen have obvious variation from May to September. They are higher at the beginning of growing season and decline towards the end. 2) The average ammonia nitrogen content of CK, LG, MG and HG in the upper 40cm soil is 17.62 mg·kg^-1, 17.84 mg·kg^-1, 18.63 mg·kg^-1 and 16.67 mg·kg^-1, respectively; the average nitrate nitrogen content is 8.91 mg·kg^-1, 8.23 mg·kg^-1, 7.99 mg·kg^-1 and 7.94 mg·kg^-1, respectively; the soil available nitrogen content is 26.53 mg·kg^-1, 26.07 mg·kg^-1, 26.62 mg·kg^-1 and 24.61 mg·kg^-1, respectively. Grazing could reduce the ammonia nitrogen and soil available nitrogen content to some extent, especially in the heavy grazing, but not evidently affect the nitrate nitrogen content. 3) Statistical analysis found that soil ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen and available nitrogen have some negative correlation with the aboveground green biomass: the more the aboveground biomass, the more soil rapidly available nitrogen consumed. This is obvious in banning grazing (CK) and light grazing (LG) and has some positive correlation with the litters. This means that litter decomposition and surface mini environment could influence the nitrogen replenishment to the soil. They have no obvious correlation with underground biomass and have negative correlation with wet deposition of nitrogen. Though wet subsidence has evident nitrogen supplies, the nitrogen consumption is still greater than supplies. Ammonia nitrogen and available nitrogen have significant negative correlation with soil organic carbon, but the correlation between nitrate nitrogen and organic carbon is not obvious. It is revealed that the more soil organic carbon, the more consumption of soil ammonia nitrogen and available nitrogen.

Key words: Haibei alpine meadow, grazing pressure gradient, rapidly available nitrogen in soil

中图分类号:

S153.6

祝景彬, 李红琴, 贺慧丹, 毛绍娟, 李英年. 牧压梯度下海北高寒草甸土壤速效氮变化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(6): 1660-1669.

ZHU Jingbin, LI Hongqin, HE Huidan, MAO Shaojuan, LI Yingnian. Analysis of the variation characteristics and controlling factors of soil rapidly available nitrogen in Haibei alpine meadow under grazing pressure gradient[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2015, 37(6): 1660-1669.

参考文献

[1] Wang Yanping, Gao Jixi, Liu Shanghua, et al. Effects of organic manure on the profile distribution of soil nitrate N in a peach orchard[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(7):1501-1505.[王艳萍, 高吉喜, 刘尚华, 等. 有机肥对桃园土壤硝态氮分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(7):1501-1505.]
[2] Hu Hongxiang, Hong Tianqiu, Fan Lili. Study on soil organic matter and N and P variations of Ma'anshan in Chaohu[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2006, 12(11):26-28.[胡宏祥, 洪天求, 樊丽莉. 巢湖马鞍山土壤有机质和N、P变化研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2006, 12(11):26-28.]
[3] Han Jianguo, Hanyongxin, Sun Tiejun, et al. Effects of returning cultivated land to herbage on soil organic matter and nitrogen in the agro-pastoral transitional zone of north China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13(4):21-28.[韩建国, 韩永伟, 孙铁军, 等. 农牧交错带退耕还草对土壤有机质和氮的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2004, 13(4):21-28.]
[4] Bashkin V N. Howarth R W. Modern Biogeochemistry[M]. New York:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003:109-125.
[5] BREEMEN V. Natural organic tendency[J]. Nature, 2002, 4(15):351-382.
[6] STEVENS C J, DISE N B, Mountford J O, et al. Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands[J]. Science, 2004, 303(5665):1876-1884.
[7] National Soil Survey Office. Soils in China[M]. Beijing:Chinese Agriculture Press, 1998:875-900.[全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1998:875-900.]
[8] Hu Jinming, Yuan Han, Li Jie, et al. Variation of soil rapid available nitrogen components and its implication in Napahai lake marsh region, Northwest Yunnan mountain[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2011, 29(3):269-275.[胡金明, 袁寒, 李杰, 等. 滇西北纳帕海湿地区域土壤速效氮组分的分异及指示意义[J]. 山地学报, 2011, 29(3):269-275.]
[9] Xu Yuqing, Li Linghao, Wang Qibing, et al. The pattern between nitrogen mineralization and grazing intensities in an Inner Mongolian typical steppe[J]. Plant and Soil, 2007, 300(1/2):289-300.
[10] Deenik J. Nitrogen mineralization potential in important agricultural soils of Hawaii[J]. Soil Crop Management, 2006, 15(1):1-5.
[11] Altesor A, Oesterheld M, Leoni E, et al. Effect of grazing on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland[J]. Plant Ecology, 2005, 179(1):83-91.
[12] Anderson P M L, Hoffman M. The impacts of sustained heavy grazing on plant diversity and composition in lowland and upland habitats across the Kamiesberg mountain range in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2007, 70(4):686-700.
[13] Sun Dashuai. Studies on the effects of grazing intensity on vegetation and soil in alpine meadow on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University, 2012.[孙大帅. 不同放牧强度对青藏高原东部高寒草甸植被和土壤影响的研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2012.]
[14] Li Wenhua, Zhou Xingmin. The ecological system of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the model of optimize using[C]//Qinghai-Tibet Plateau research series. Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press, 1998, 39:183-270.[李文华, 周兴民. 青藏高原生态系统及优化利用模式[C]//青藏高原研究丛书. 广州:广东科技出版社, 1998, 39:183-270.]
[15] Fang Jingyun, Liu Guohua, Xu Songling. Chinese terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle and its global significance[C]//Concenrations of greenhouse gases and emission monitoring and its related process. Beijing:China Environmental Science Press, 1996:129-139.[方精云, 刘国华, 徐嵩龄. 中国陆地生态系统的碳循环及其全球意义[C]//温室气体浓度和排放监测及相关过程. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1996:129-139.]
[16] Piao Shilong, Fang Jingyun. Dynamic vegetation cover change over the last 18 years in China[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2001, 21(4):294-302.[朴世龙, 方精云. 最近18年中国植被覆盖的动态变化[J]. 第四纪研究, 2001, 21(4):294-302.]
[17] Yang Shengren, Liu Changming, Sun Rui, et al. The vegetation cover over last 20 years in Yellow River basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(6):679-684.[杨胜人, 刘昌明, 孙睿, 等. 最近20年来黄河流域植被覆盖变化析[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(6):679-684.]
[18] Li Yingnian, Zhao Xinuan, Cao Guangmin, et al. Analyses on Chinese and vegetation productivity background at Haibei alpine meadow ecosystem research station[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2004, 23(4):558-567.[李英年, 赵新全, 曹广民, 等. 海北高寒草甸生态系统定位站气候、植被生产力背景的分析[J]. 高原气象, 2004, 23(4):558-567.]
[19] Zhou Xingmin. Chinese kobresia meadow[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2001.[周兴民. 中国嵩草草甸[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2001.]
[20] Liu Xiaoqin, Wu Qihua, Li Hongqin, et al. A comparison of the vegetation/soil carbon density and net ecosystem CO₂exchange of alpine meadow with different enclose durations[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2013, 35(4):848-856.[刘晓琴, 吴启华, 李红琴, 等. 高寒草甸不同封育年限植被/土壤碳密度及净生态系统CO₂交换量的比较[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(4):848-856.]
[21] Wang Qilan, Yang Tao. The study on alpine meadow soil nitrogen metabolism strength[C]//The alpine meadow ecosystem. Beijing:Science Press, 1995:179-187.[王启兰, 杨涛. 高寒草甸土壤氮素代谢作用强度的研究[C]//高寒草甸生态系统. 北京:科学出版社, 1995:179-187.]
[22] Gao Yingzhi, Wang Shiping, Han Xingguo, et al. Soil nitrogen regime and the relationship between aboveground green phytobiomass and soil nitrogen fractions at different stocking rates in the Xilin River basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2004, 28(3):285-293.[高英志,汪诗平,韩兴国, 等. 退化草地恢复过程中土壤氮素状况以及与植被地上绿色生物量形成关系的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(3):285-293.]
[23] Yao Aixing, Wang Pei, Xia Jingxin, et al. Effects of different grazing intensity for dairy cows on soil characteristics of Perennial Ryegrass/White Clover Sward[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1995, 3(3):181-189.[姚爱兴, 王培, 夏景新, 等. 不同放牧强度下奶牛对多年生黑麦草/白三叶草地土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 1995, 3(3):181-189.]
[24] Rong Yuping, Han Jianguo, Wang Pei, et al. The effects of grazing intensity on soil physics and chemical properties[J]. Grassland of China, 2001, 23(4):42-48.[戎郁萍, 韩建国, 王培, 等. 放牧强度对草地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国草地, 2001, 23(4):42-48.]
[25] Pei Haikun. Effects of different grazing intensity on soil nutrient and texture[J]. Journal of Qinghai University, 2004, 22(4):29-31.[裴海昆. 不同放牧强度对土壤养分及质地的影响[J]. 青海大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 22(4):29-31.]
[26] Wang Lin, Ouyang Hua, Zhou Caiping, et al. Distribution of soil organic matters and nitrogen in the east slope of Gongga mountain[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(6):1012-1019.[王琳, 欧阳华, 周才平, 等. 贡嘎山东坡土壤有机质及氮素分布特征[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6):1012-1019.]
[27] Wang Shuhui, Shao Yan, Li Tianfu, et al. Study on the content of organic matter and nitrogen in Yunnan tobacco growing soils[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2006(5):18-20.[王树会, 邵岩, 李天福, 等. 云南植烟土壤有机质与氮含量的研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2006(5):18-20.]

牧压梯度下海北高寒草甸土壤速效氮变化特征及其影响因素分析

Analysis of the variation characteristics and controlling factors of soil rapidly available nitrogen in Haibei alpine meadow under grazing pressure gradient

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0