水权交易中第三方回流效应分析——以张掖市甘临高地区为例

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2018.0046

冰川冻土 ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 404-414.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2018.0046

• 生态经济与可持续发展 • 上一篇

水权交易中第三方回流效应分析——以张掖市甘临高地区为例

武翠芳¹, 熊金辉³, 邓晓红⁴, 易海迎⁵, 张琳玲⁵

1. 兰州财经大学农林经济管理学院, 甘肃兰州 730101;
2. 北京大学经济学院, 北京 100871;
3. 中国地质大学经济管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074;
4. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院内陆河流域生态水文重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000;
5. 兰州财经大学经济学院, 甘肃兰州 730101

收稿日期:2017-06-05 修回日期:2018-01-05 出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2018-07-02
通讯作者: 熊金辉,E-mail:huijin0115@sina.com E-mail:huijin0115@sina.com
作者简介:武翠芳(1975-),女,甘肃靖远人,副教授,2009年在中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所获博士学位,从事生态经济方面研究.E-mail:wucf@lzcc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41401645）；国家社会科学基金项目（10CGL050）；兰州财经大学科研专项经费项目资助

Effect of return flows of third party in water rights transaction: a case study in Zhangye Prefecture

WU Cuifang¹, XIONG Jinhui³, DENG Xiaohong⁴, YI Haiying⁵, ZHANG Linling⁵

1. School of Agriculture & Forestry Economics and Management, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730101, China;
2. School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing 100080, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
5. School of Economics, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730101, China

Received:2017-06-05 Revised:2018-01-05 Online:2018-04-25 Published:2018-07-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水权交易是提高水资源配置效率和利用效率的有效途径，但交易过程中第三方回流效应的存在是对水权市场的严峻挑战。如何解决这种第三方效应问题是完善水市场、提高水资源使用效率的关键。根据设计的张掖市甘临高地区可能实现的水权交易情景模式，测算了实际水权交易运行中回流效应的大小；设计一种水权交易比率制度，并使用MATLAB仿真模拟平台进行一般水权交易和水权交易比率制度的模拟。结果表明：农业部门内部水权交易回流效应主要受到交易水量规模的影响，当取最大可交易水量30%、50%和80%时，盈科灌区-骆驼城灌区水权交易引起鸭暖灌区的第三方回流效应分别为-5.97×10⁶ m³、-9.95×10⁶ m³和-1.59×10¹¹ m³，市场规模越大，第三方回流效应越大；水权交易比率制度下的用户用水总效益为1.09×10⁹元，比水权交易的初始分配状态用水效益7.51×10⁸元提高3.41×10⁸元。对比表明水权交易比率制度可以在避免第三方回流效应的同时可以提高水市场的用水效益。

关键词: 水权交易, 回流效应, 比率制度, MATLAB平台

Abstract: Water rights transaction is one of effective ways to improve the efficiency of water allocation and utilization. However, there is a severe challenge to the water right market due to the effect of return flows of third party. How to solve the problem of third party effect is the key to a perfect water market and to a higher efficiency of water use. In this paper, the scenarios of water transaction were designed, and the real effect of water rights transaction was estimated in Gan-Lin-Gao district of Zhangye Prefecture. Then a trading-ratio system was designed for water market to simulate the water right exchange rate and general water right trade with MATLAB simulation platform. Research results indicate that the effect of return flow during water right transaction within the agricultural sector is mainly affected by water amount. Taking the maximum tradable water amount as 30%, 50% and 80%, the water rights transaction between Yin'ke and Luotuocheng irrigation districts will result in return flows of third party of -5.97×10⁶ m³, -9.95×10⁶ m³ and -1.59×10¹¹ m³ in Yanuan irrigation district, respectively; the greater the size of the market, the larger the return flows of third party. The total benefit of users under the water rights transaction ratio system is 1.09 billion RMB, which has increased by 0.34 billion RMB as compared with the initial state of allocation. The comparison shows that the water rights transaction ratio system can raise the efficiency of the water market and avoid the effect of return flows of third party simultaneously.

Key words: water rights transaction, effect of return flows, trading-ratio system, MATLAB platform

中图分类号:

TV213.4

武翠芳, 熊金辉, 邓晓红, 易海迎, 张琳玲. 水权交易中第三方回流效应分析——以张掖市甘临高地区为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(2): 404-414.

WU Cuifang, XIONG Jinhui, DENG Xiaohong, YI Haiying, ZHANG Linling. Effect of return flows of third party in water rights transaction: a case study in Zhangye Prefecture[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2018, 40(2): 404-414.

参考文献

[1] Yao Junqiang, Yang Qing, Mao Weiyi, et al. Evaluation of the impacts of climate change and human activities on the hydrological environment in Central Asia[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2016, 38(1):222-230.[姚俊强, 杨青, 毛炜峄, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对中亚地区水文环境的影响评估[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(1):222-230.]
[2] Yin Zhenliang, Feng Qi, Liu Shiyin, et al. The application progress of hydrological model in quantifying the contribution of glacier runoff to total watershed runoff[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2016, 38(1):248-258.[尹振良, 冯起, 刘时银, 等. 水文模型在估算冰川径流研究中的应用现状[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(1):248-258.]
[3] Han Jinmian. Research of the third effects in the process of water property right transaction[D]. Xi'an:Northwest University, 2009.[韩锦绵. 水权交易的第三方效应研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2009.]
[4] Rosegrant M W, Schleyer R G, Yaday S N. Water police for efficient agriculture[J]. Food Police, 1995, 20(3):203-223.
[5] Velázquez E. Water trade in Andalusia. Virtual water:an alternative way to manage water use[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 63(1):201-208.
[6] Novo P, Garrido A, Varela-Ortega C. Are virtual water "flows" in Spanish grain trade consistent with relative water scarcity?[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(5):1454-1464.
[7] Ladson A, Finlayson B. Rhetoric and reality in the allocation of water to the environment:a case study of the Goulburn River, Victoria, Australia[J]. River Research and Applications, 2002, 18(6):555-568.
[8] Bouma J A, Biggs T W, Bouwer L M. The downstream externalities of harvesting rainwater in semi-arid watersheds:an Indian case study[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(7):1162-1170.
[9] Etchells T, Malano H M, McMahon T A. Overcoming third party effects from water trading in the Murray Darling basin[J]. Water Policy, 2006, 8(1):69-80.
[10] Heaney A, Dwyer G, Beare S, et al. Third-party effects of water trading and potential policy responses[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2006, 50(3):277-293.
[11] Oad R, DiSpigno M. Water rights to return flow from urban landscape irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1997, 123(4):293-299.
[12] Hanak E. Stopping the drain:third-party responses to California's water market[J]. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2005, 23(1):59-77.
[13] Murphy J J, Dinar A, Howitt R E, et al. The design of water markets when instream flows have value[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(2):1089-1096.
[14] Ma Xiaoqiang, Han Jinmian. Identification of the third party effects in the process of water property rights transaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(12):85-91.[马晓强, 韩锦绵. 水权交易第三方效应辨识研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(12):85-91.]
[15] Li Wanming, Tan Zhouling. The analysis of externality in the water rights trading of Manas River basin[J]. Ecological Economy, 2014, 30(12):180-183.[李万明, 谭周令. 玛纳斯河流域水权交易外部性分析[J]. 生态经济, 2014, 30(12):180-183.]
[16] Xiao Daiji, Liu Ying, Hong Mingfeng. A trading-retio system for water market[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2004(6):69-77.[萧代基, 刘莹, 洪鸣丰. 水权交易比率制度的设计与模拟[J]. 经济研究, 2004(6):69-77.]
[17] Wang Weiren, Tu Meizeng. Analysis on bilateral auction price of water right based on returning flow model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(1):115-119.[王为人, 屠梅曾. 基于回流模型的水权交易双方叫价拍卖分析[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(1):115-119.]
[18] Jian Fuhui, Song Xiaoyu, Yu Wenbao. Construction of the evaluation system of water asset price with fuzzy comprehensive assessment indexes:taking Zhangye Prefecture in Heihe River basin as an example[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2016, 38(2):567-572.[简富缋, 宋晓谕, 虞文宝. 水资源资产价格模糊数学综合评价指标体系构建——以黑河中游张掖市为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(2):567-572.]
[19] Cai Guoying, Xu Zhongmin. Input-output analysis of the water consumption for economic development in the middle reaches of Heihe River:a case study in Zhangye Municipality[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2013, 35(3):770-775.[蔡国英, 徐中民. 黑河流域中游国民经济用水投入产出分析——以张掖市为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(3):770-775.]
[20] Ma Xueming. Research on comprehensive evaluation of agriculture water saving potential in middle researches of the Heihe River[D]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University, 2009.[马学明. 黑河中游地区农业节水潜力综合评价[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2009.]
[21] Cheng Lin. Twenty-one new enterprises for economic technological development zone in Zhangye in 2014[N]. Zhangye Daily, 2015-01-16(1).[成林. 张掖市经济技术开发区2014年新增企业21户[N]. 张掖日报, 2015-01-16(1).]
[22] Nie Jie. Analysis of irrigation return flow in the rice-growing district of Taihu Lake Plain[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 1992(2):2-5.[聂杰. 太湖平原田水区灌溉回归水分析[J]. 农田水利与小水电, 1992(2):2-5.]
[23] Gu He. Coefficient and threshold calculation analysis of Gansu agricultural irrigation water use[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University, 2014.[顾贺. 甘肃农业灌溉用水有效利用系数测算及阈值分析研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2014.]
[24] Li Jinhua, Yang Xiaoguang, Cao Shiyu, et al. Water requirement and crop coefficient of different planting patterns in Zhangye area of Gansu Province[J]. Acta Agriculture Jiangxi, 2009, 21(4):17-20.[李金华, 杨晓光, 曹诗瑜, 等. 甘肃张掖地区不同种植模式需水特征及作物系数分析. 江西农业学报, 2009, 21(4):17-20.]
[25] Liu Hongmei, Wang Keqiang, Zheng Ce. A study on the returning flow of third party in water right trade[J]. Finance & Economics, 2006(1):58-65.[刘红梅, 王克强, 郑策. 水权交易中第三方回流问题研究[J]. 财经科学, 2006(1):58-65].
[26] Burness H S, Quirk J P. Appropriative water rights and the efficient allocation of resources[J]. The American Economic Review, 1979, 69(1):25-37.
[27] Chen Xianghong, Yang Bao, Wang Zhangyong, et al. Research on water demand for eco-environment of middle reaches' stream-channel of Heihe River basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 17(6):194-197.[陈翔红, 杨保, 王章勇, 等. 黑河中游河道生态环境需水量研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(6):194-197.]
[28] Long Xunjian, Qian Ju, Zhang Chunmin. Multi-objective programming of water resources based on MATLAB plattorm:take Guazhou County as an example[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2007(6):65-67.[龙训建, 钱鞠, 张春敏. 基于MATLAB平台求解水资源多目标规划问题——以瓜州县为例[J].节水灌溉, 2007(6):65-67.]

水权交易中第三方回流效应分析——以张掖市甘临高地区为例

Effect of return flows of third party in water rights transaction: a case study in Zhangye Prefecture

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	黄珊, 冯起, 齐敬辉, 陆志翔, 龚志宏. 河西走廊疏勒河流域水资源管理问题分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(4): 846-852.
[2]	苏芳, 尚海洋, 丁杨. 水足迹视角下低水消费模式研究——以黑河流域张掖市居民消费为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3): 625-633.
[3]	曲玮, 李振涛, Eefje AARNOUDSE, 谭艳美, 赵怡芳. 甘肃河西走廊内陆河流域节水战略选择——地表水与地下水联合管理[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(1): 145-155.
[4]	陈惠雄, 徐菲菲, 王晓鹏. 水资源管理制度超模博弈分析——以钱塘江与黑河为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(5): 1089-1097.
[5]	艾萨迪拉·玉苏甫, 安瓦尔·买买提明. 新疆喀什地区城镇化过程中用水量预测[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(3): 688-695.
[6]	吴兆丹, 吴兆磊, 张长征. 多区域投入产出分析下中国水足迹地区间比较——基于经济区域分析层次[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(1): 207-219.
[7]	简富缋, 宋晓谕, 虞文宝. 水资源资产价格模糊数学综合评价指标体系构建——以黑河中游张掖市为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(2): 567-572.
[8]	邓晓雅, 杨志峰, 龙爱华*. 基于流域水资源合理配置的塔里木河流域生态调度研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(6): 1600-1609.
[9]	徐中民, 宋晓谕, 程国栋. 虚拟水战略新论[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2): 490-495.
[10]	盖迎春, 李新. 水资源管理决策支持系统研究进展与展望[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(5): 1248-1256.
[11]	曲玮, 牛叔文. 中国干旱地区内陆河流域水资源利用与保护[J]. 冰川冻土, 2007, 29(4): 595-602.
[12]	巩增泰, 徐中民. 干旱区内陆河流域水资源管理配置数学模型[J]. 冰川冻土, 2002, 24(4): 380-386.