基于不同土地覆盖类型NDSI阈值优化下的青藏高原积雪判别

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2019.1155

冰川冻土 ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1162-1172.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2019.1155

基于不同土地覆盖类型NDSI阈值优化下的青藏高原积雪判别

高扬^1,2, 郝晓华², 和栋材¹, 黄广辉², 王建^2,3, 赵宏宇², 魏亚瑞⁴, 邵东航⁵, 王卫国²

1. 太原理工大学矿业工程学院, 山西太原 030024;
2. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心, 江苏南京 210023;
4. 兰州交通大学测绘与地理信息学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
5. 电子科技大学资源与环境学院, 四川成都 611731

收稿日期:2019-07-09 修回日期:2019-08-30 发布日期:2020-02-24
通讯作者: 郝晓华,E-mail:haoxh@lzb.ac.cn. E-mail:haoxh@lzb.ac.cn
作者简介:高扬(1993-),女,山西运城人,2017年在忻州师范学院获学士学位,现为太原理工大学在读硕士研究生,从事积雪遥感研究.E-mail:yanggao0924@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（91547210；41971325；41571358）；科技基础资源调查专项（2017FY100502）资助

Snow cover mapping algorithm in the Tibetan Plateau based on NDSI threshold optimization of different land cover types

GAO Yang^1,2, HAO Xiaohua², HE Dongcai¹, HUANG Guanghui², WANG Jian^2,3, ZHAO Hongyu², WEI Yarui⁴, SHAO Donghang⁵, WANG Weiguo²

1. College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
2. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China;
4. Faculty of Geomatics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
5. School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Received:2019-07-09 Revised:2019-08-30 Published:2020-02-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 美国国家雪冰数据中心（NSIDC）发布的MODIS第6版本逐日积雪范围产品（V6）仅提供了归一化积雪指数（NDSI），而用户往往关心的是积雪范围或积雪覆盖率。NSIDC推荐全球积雪范围最佳的NDSI阈值为0.4，但是青藏高原地形复杂，积雪斑块化特征明显，单一的NDSI阈值并不能精确地判识不同下垫面上的积雪。不同的土地覆盖类型可能影响积雪判别的NDSI阈值。以青藏高原为研究对象，基于高分辨率卫星Landsat-5 TM数据，获取了青藏高原不同土地覆盖类型下判识积雪的最优NDSI阈值。结果表明，在草地和稀疏植被地表类型下，最优NDSI阈值分别为0.33和0.40；在其他下垫面类型下，最优NDSI阈值为0.47。以Landsat 8 OLI数据为"真值"对该NDSI阈值确定的积雪范围进行了精度检验。结果表明，采用新的NDSI阈值获取的MOD10A1 V6积雪范围产品的总体精度OA、错分误差OE和漏分误差UE分别为87.88%、5.20%和6.87%。而采用传统的0.4阈值时，其OA、OE和UE分别为87.36%、3.98%和8.60%。这表明考虑不同土地覆盖类型下的NDSI阈值优化可以有效地提高青藏高原积雪判别精度，特别是对占比面积较大的草地区域，通过NDSI阈值优化可以更加准确地识别积雪范围。

关键词: MOD10A1 V6积雪范围产品, 青藏高原, 归一化积雪指数(NDSI), 土地覆盖类型, Landsat

Abstract: The sixth version of MODIS (V6), released by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), offers only normalized difference snow index (NDSI). Users are often concerned about snow cover or fraction of snow cover. NSIDC recommends the world's best snow cover NDSI threshold of 0.4, but the terrain of the Tibetan Plateau is complex, the characteristics of snow patching are obvious, and a single NDSI threshold does not accurately identify snow on different land cover types. Different types of land cover may affect the NDSI threshold. Based on the high-resolution Landsat-5 TM data, in this paper, the optimal threshold of NDSI is obtained for identifying snow cover under different land cover types in the Tibetan Plateau. The results show that the optimal thresholds of NDSI are 0.33 and 0.4, respectively, under the type of grassland and sparse vegetation. The optimal threshold of NDSI is 0.47 under other land cover types. The snow cover determined by the NDSI threshold is accurately validated using Landsat 8 OLI data as "true value". The results show that the overall accuracy (OA), overestimated error (OE) and underestimated error (UE) of MODIS snow cover product based on new NDSI threshold are 87.88%, 5.20% and 6.87%, respectively. It is found that the OA, OE and UE based on traditional 0.4 threshold are 87.36%, 3.98% and 8.60%, respectively. It shows that NDSI threshold optimization under different land cover types can effectively improve the accuracy of snow cover in the Tibetan Plateau, especially in grassland areas with a large proportion of area, and the snow cover can be more accurately identified by NDSI threshold optimization.

Key words: MOD10A1 snow cover product (V6), Tibetan Plateau, normalized difference snow index (NDSI), land cover types, Landsat

中图分类号:

TP75

高扬, 郝晓华, 和栋材, 黄广辉, 王建, 赵宏宇, 魏亚瑞, 邵东航, 王卫国. 基于不同土地覆盖类型NDSI阈值优化下的青藏高原积雪判别[J]. 冰川冻土, 2019, 41(5): 1162-1172.

GAO Yang, HAO Xiaohua, HE Dongcai, HUANG Guanghui, WANG Jian, ZHAO Hongyu, WEI Yarui, SHAO Donghang, WANG Weiguo. Snow cover mapping algorithm in the Tibetan Plateau based on NDSI threshold optimization of different land cover types[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2019, 41(5): 1162-1172.

参考文献

[1] Zhang R, Zhang R, Zuo Z, et al. Temporal and spatial features and inter-annual variability of wintertime snow mass balance over China[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2016, 36(12):3897-3907.
[2] Che Tao, Li Xin. Spatial distribution and temporal variation of snow water resources in China during 1993-2002[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2005, 27(1):64-67.[车涛, 李新. 1993-2002年中国积雪水资源时空分布与变化特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2005, 27(1):64-67.]
[3] Yang J, Jiang L, Ménard C B, et al. Evaluation of snow products over the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015, 29(15):3247-3260.
[4] Ma L J, Qin D H. Temporal-spatial characteristics of observed key parameters of snow cover in China during 1957-2009[J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2012, 4(5):384-393.
[5] Liu Tongde. Study on sustainable development in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2009:1-26.[刘同德. 青藏高原区域可持续发展研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2009:1-26.
[6] Yang Zhigang, Dawa, Chuduo. Spatiotemporal variations of snow cover on the Tibetan Plateau over the last 15 years[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2017, 32(1):27-36.[杨志刚, 达娃, 除多. 近15 a青藏高原积雪覆盖时空变化分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2017, 32(1):27-36.]
[7] Xu L, Niu R, Zhao Y, et al. Snow cover mapping over the Tibetan Plateau with MODIS and ASTER data[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Earth Observation for Global Changes:vol 7471. Bellingham, WA, USA:International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2009:1-8.
[8] Tang B H, Shrestha B, Li Z L, et al. Determination of snow cover from MODIS data for the Tibetan Plateau region[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013, 21:356-365.
[9] Li Xifu, Tang Hongyu. Analysis of spatial distribution and change of snow-covered days on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 38(5):153-160.[李锡福, 唐红玉. 青藏高原积雪日数的空间分布及变化分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(5):153-160.]
[10] Li Wenjie, Yuan Chaoxia, Zhao Ping. Uncertainty of snow cover and its changes in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau:a comparative analysis of three types of snow cover observation data[J]. Journal of the Meteorological Sciences, 2018, 38(6):719-729.[李文杰, 袁潮霞, 赵平. 青藏高原地区积雪及其变化的不确定性:3种积雪观测资料的对比分析[J]. 气象科学, 2018, 38(6):719-729.]
[11] Immerzeel W W, Droogers P, Jong S M D, et al. Large-scale monitoring of snow cover and runoff simulation in Himalayan river basins using remote sensing[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(1):40-49.
[12] Dankers R, De Jong S M. Monitoring snow-cover dynamics in Northern Fennoscandia with SPOT VEGETATION images[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 25(15):2933-2949.
[13] Kunzi K F, Patil S, Rott H. Snow-cover parameters retrieverd from Nimbus-7 Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR) data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1982, 20(4):452-467.
[14] Grody N C, Basist A N. Global identification of snowcover using SSM/I measurements[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996, 34(1):237-249.
[15] Cherchali S, Amram O, Flouzat G. Retrieval of temporal profiles of reflectances from simulated and real NOAA-AVHRR data over heterogeneous landscapes[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, 21(4):753-775.
[16] Hall D K, Riggs G A, Salomonson V V, et al. MODIS snow-cover products[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 83(1):181-194.
[17] Kelly R E, Chang A T, Tsang L, et al. A prototype AMSR-E global snow area and snow depth algorithm[J]. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(2):230-242.
[18] Maskey S, Uhlenbrook S, Ojha S. An analysis of snow cover changes in the Himalayan region using MODIS snow products and in-situ temperature data[J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 108(1/2):391-400.
[19] Arsenault K R, Houser P R, Lannoy G J D. Evaluation of the MODIS snow cover fraction product[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2014, 28(3):980-998.
[20] Hall D K, Riggs G A. Accuracy assessment of the MODIS snow products[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 21(12):1534-1547.
[21] Guo Jianping, Liu Huan, An Linchang. Study on variation of snow cover and its orographic impact over Qinghai-Xizang Plateau during 2001-2012[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2016, 35(1):24-33.[郭建平, 刘欢, 安林昌. 2001-2012年青藏高原积雪覆盖率变化及地形影响[J]. 高原气象, 2016, 35(1):24-33.]
[22] Parajka J, Blöschl G. Validation of MODIS snow cover images over Austria[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2006, 10(5):679-689.
[23] Huang X, Liang T, Zhang X, et al. Validation of MODIS snow cover products using Landsat and ground measurements during the 2001-2005 snow seasons over northern Xinjiang, China[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2011, 32(1):133-152.
[24] Klein A G, Barnett A C. Validation of daily MODIS snow cover maps of the Upper Rio Grande River Basin for the 2000-2001 snow year[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 86(2):162-176.
[25] Flueraru C, Stancalie G, Craciunescu V, et al. A validation of MODIS snowcover products in Romania:challenges and future directions[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2010, 11(6):927-941.
[26] Riggs G A, Hall D K, Román M. MODIS snow products user guide for Collection 6(C6)[R/OL].[2019-07-02]. https://modis-snow-ice.gsfc.nasa.gov/uploads/C6_MODIS_Snow_User_Guide.pdf.
[27] Gladkova I, Grossberg M, Bonev G, et al. Increasing the accuracy of MODIS/Aqua snow product using quantitative image restoration technique[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2012, 9(4):740-743.
[28] Zhang H, Zhang F, Zhang G, et al. Ground-based evaluation of MODIS snow cover product V6 across China:implications for the selection of NDSI threshold[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651:2712-2726.
[29] Riggs G A, Hall D K. MODIS snow cover algorithms and products:improvements for Collection 6[C/OL]//Proceedings of the 68th Eastern Snow Conference, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 14-16, 2011[2019-07-02]. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/58b98f7bd1758e4cc271d365/t/5c379590c2241bd03a9691ec/1547146641859/Riggsandhall.pdf.
[30] Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, et al. Google Earth Engine:planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 202:18-27.
[31] Friedl M A, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, et al. MODIS Collection 5 global land cover:algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(1):168-182.
[32] Teillet P M, Barker J L, Markham B L, et al. Radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TM sensors based on tandem data sets[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 78(1):39-54.
[33] Xu Hanqiu, Tang Fei. Analysis of new characteristics of the first Landsat 8 image and their ecoenvironmental significance[J]. Ecta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(11):3249-3257.[徐涵秋, 唐菲. 新一代Landsat系列卫星:Landsat 8遥感影像新增特征及其生态环境意义[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(11):3249-3257.]
[34] Olofsson P, Foody G M, Stehman S V, et al. Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies:estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 129(2):122-131.

基于不同土地覆盖类型NDSI阈值优化下的青藏高原积雪判别

Snow cover mapping algorithm in the Tibetan Plateau based on NDSI threshold optimization of different land cover types

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	赵晔蕾, 许诗枫, 许嘉慧, 黄艳, 彭小宝, 王淑杰, 刘红星, 余柏蒗, 吴健平. 南极Getz F冰架表面冰流速及结构特征时空变化分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2022, 44(1): 106-116.
[2]	孟雅丽, 段克勤, 尚溦, 李双双, 邢莉, 石培宏. 基于CMIP6模式数据的1961—2100年青藏高原地表气温时空变化分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2022, 44(1): 24-33.
[3]	柴乐, 张威, 刘亮, 马瑞丰, 唐倩玉, 李亚鹏, 乔静茹. 青藏高原东南部他念他翁山全新世早中期冰进事件研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2022, 44(1): 307-315.
[4]	张怡, 段克勤, 石培宏. 1979—2100年青藏高原夏季大气0 ℃层高度变化分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2022, 44(1): 34-45.
[5]	达伟, 王书峰, 沈永平, 陈安安, 毛炜峄, 张伟. 1957—2019年昆仑山北麓车尔臣河流域水文情势及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2022, 44(1): 46-55.
[6]	刘广岳, 邹德富, 杨斌, 杜二计, 周华云, 肖瑶, 赵林, 谭昌海, 胡国杰, 庞强强, 王武, 孙哲, 朱小凡, 殷秀峰, 汪凌霄, 李智斌, 谢昌卫. 青藏高原腹地各拉丹冬南北坡多年冻土考察初步结果[J]. 冰川冻土, 2022, 44(1): 83-95.
[7]	罗京, 牛富俊, 林战举, 刘明浩, 尹国安, 高泽永. 青藏高原多年冻土区热融滑塌发育特征及规律[J]. 冰川冻土, 2022, 44(1): 96-105.
[8]	除多,扎西顿珠,次丹玉珍. NOAA IMS雪冰产品在青藏高原积雪监测中的适用性分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(6): 1659-1672.
[9]	卓嘎,罗布,巴桑曲珍. 青藏高原那曲中部土壤温湿分布特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(6): 1704-1717.
[10]	王世金,魏彦强,牛春华,张云飞. 青藏高原多灾种自然灾害综合风险管理[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(6): 1848-1860.
[11]	李若晨,申保收,武小波,杨方社,郭忠明. 青藏高原典型山地冰川中痕量元素的空间分布和来源分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(5): 1277-1289.
[12]	曹瑜,游庆龙,蔡子怡. 1961—2019年青藏高原中东部夏季强降水与大尺度环流的关系[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(5): 1290-1300.
[13]	王一博,吕明侠,赵海鹏,高泽永. 青藏高原多年冻土区活动层土壤入渗特征及机理分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(5): 1301-1311.
[14]	段群滔,罗立辉. 人类活动强度空间化方法综述与展望[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(5): 1582-1593.
[15]	刘艺阗, 姚济敏, 赵林, 肖瑶, 乔永平, 史健宗. 青藏高原唐古拉多年冻土区冻融循环过程中的能量平衡特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(4): 1073-1082.