青藏工程走廊楚玛尔河高平原区路基边界温度特征

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2016.0156

冰川冻土 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1332-1339.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2016.0156

青藏工程走廊楚玛尔河高平原区路基边界温度特征

胡达^1,2, 喻文兵¹, 易鑫^1,2, 韩风雷^1,2

1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所冻土工程国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2016-05-10 修回日期:2016-09-03 出版日期:2016-10-25 发布日期:2017-01-22
通讯作者: 喻文兵,E-mail:yuwb@lzb.ac.cn. E-mail:yuwb@lzb.ac.cn
作者简介:胡达(1991-),男,四川内江人,2014年毕业于郑州大学,现为中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所在读硕士研究生,主要从事冻土环境灾害与工程类方面的研究.E-mail:huda@lzb.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（41571070；41461016）；国家基础科学发展计划（973计划）项目（2012CB026）资助

Boundary temperature features of the embankment in Qumar River region along the Qinghai-Tibet transportation engineering corridor

HU Da^1，2, YU Wenbing¹, YI Xin^1，2, HAN Fenglei^1，2

1. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2016-05-10 Revised:2016-09-03 Online:2016-10-25 Published:2017-01-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于青藏高原楚玛尔河地区青藏公路里程K2968+200断面浅层地温监测数据（地表下5 cm），拟合了边界温度的回归方程，分析了公路路基及铁路路基两侧表层温度的特征.同时对路基坡面温度和理论辐射值的相关性进行了分析.结果表明：边界温度回归方程拟合程度较高，可作为冻土路基数值模拟温度边界选取的参考依据；监测断面公路和铁路路基都表现出显著的阴阳坡差异，公路左右坡面冬季温度差异达11.49℃，年均值差4.77℃，冬季铁路路基左右坡脚温度差异达到5.34℃，年均值差3.33℃，天然地表与气温的差值为5.2℃；根据融化与冻结n系数，位于阳坡一侧的冻结n系数较低且融化n系数大，表现为吸热；阴坡一侧冻结n系数较大，整体呈现出放热效应；路基边坡太阳理论辐射与温度变化趋势基本一致.

关键词: 青藏工程走廊, 路基, 边界温度, n系数

Abstract:

Based on the observation of surface temperature (5-cm in depth) at K2968.2 of the Qinghai-Tibet Highway in Qumar River region on the Tibetan Plateau, the regression equations of the boundary temperature are fitted, and the differences in thermal state between south-facing and north-facing slopes of the railway and highway embankments are analyzed. It is revealed that the boundary temperature regression equation has high fitting degree, which can be used to numerically simulate the frozen soil embankments. The monitoring section of highway and railway embankments shows significant differences between south-facing and north-facing slopes. The temperature difference between the left and right slopes of the highway is 11.49℃ in winter, and its annual mean value is 4.77℃. The temperature difference between right and left embankment toes reaches 5.34℃ in winter, with an annual mean of 3.33℃. The difference between the mean annual original surface and air temperatures is 5.2℃. Looking from Freeze/thaw n-factors, with a lower freezing n-factor and a higher thawing n-factor, the south-facing slope exhibits an endothermic behavior; on the contrary, the north-facing slope shows exothermic effect. However, in the north-facing slope, there is a larger freezing n-factor, resulting in exothermic effect. There is basically the same changing tendency of solar radiation and temperature change on embankment slopes.

Key words: Qinghai-Tibet transportation engineering corridor, embankment, boundary temperature, n-factor

中图分类号:

P642.14

胡达, 喻文兵, 易鑫, 韩风雷. 青藏工程走廊楚玛尔河高平原区路基边界温度特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(5): 1332-1339.

HU Da, YU Wenbing, YI Xin, HAN Fenglei. Boundary temperature features of the embankment in Qumar River region along the Qinghai-Tibet transportation engineering corridor[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2016, 38(5): 1332-1339.

参考文献

[1] Chou Yaling, Shen Yu, Ma Wei, et al. Discussion on shallow ground temperature of embankment in permafrost regions on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Soil Eng. and Foundation, 2008, 22(1):44-47.[丑亚玲, 盛煜, 马巍, 等. 青藏高原多年冻土区路基表面浅层地温探讨[J]. 土工基础, 2008, 22(1):44-47.]

[2] Chou Yaling, Shen Yu, Wei Zhenming. Temperature and deformation differences between southern and northern slopes of highway embankment on permafrost[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(09):1896-1903.[丑亚玲, 盛煜, 韦振明. 多年冻土区公路路基阴阳坡温度及变形差异分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(09):1896-1903.]

[3] Wei Zhi, Shen Yu, Wu Qingbai. Dynamic monitoring of thermal state for shallow ground in Qinghai-Tibet Railway embankment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(S2):2664-2668.[温智, 盛煜, 吴青柏. 青藏铁路路基浅地表热状态动态监测初步分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(S2):2664-2668.]

[4] Shen Yu, Ma Wei, Wei Zhi, et al. Analysis of difference in thermal state between south faced and north faced slope of railway embankment in permafrost regions[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2005, 24(17):3197-3201.[盛煜, 马巍, 温智, 等. 多年冻土区铁路路基阴阳坡面热状况差异分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(17):3197-3201.]

[5] Yang Chengsong, He Ping, Cheng Guodong, et al. Current state and progress of the study on the thawing settlement of frozen ground[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004, 12(1):147-150.[杨成松, 何平, 程国栋, 等. 冻土热融下沉研究的现状和进展[J]. 工程地质学报, 2004, 12(1):147-150.]

[6] Laba Zhuoma, Pubu Guiji. Climate change and meteorological disasters in recent 40 years along the Qinghai Tibet Railway[J]. Tibet Science and Technology, 2007(6):66-68.[拉巴卓玛, 普布贵吉. 青藏铁路沿线近40年气候变化和气象灾害特征[J]. 西藏科技, 2007(6):66-68.]

[7] Hu Zeyong, Cheng Guodong, Gu Lianglei, et al. Calculating method of global radiation and temperature on the roadbed surface of Qinghai-Xizang Railway[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2007, 21(12):1304-1313.[胡泽勇, 程国栋, 谷良雷, 等. 青藏铁路路基表面太阳总辐射和温度反演方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 21(12):1304-1313.]

[8] Wang Keli, Cheng Guodong. Thermodynamic model of the ground surface and the roadbed surface along the Qinghai-Tibetan Railway (Ⅰ):Physical process and experimental scheme[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2002, 24(6):759-764.[王可丽, 程国栋. 青藏铁路沿线地表和路基表面热力学模式(Ⅰ):物理过程与实验方案[J]. 冰川冻土, 2002, 24(6):759-764.]

[9] Yi Xin, Yu Wenbing, Chen Lin, et al. Influence of conditions on the thermal stability of embankments in permafrost regions[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(2):369-375.[易鑫, 喻文兵, 陈琳,等. 边界条件对多年冻土路基热稳定性的影响分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(2):369-375.]

[10] Wu Ziwang, Cheng Guodong, Zhu Linnan, et al. Roadbed engineering in permafrost region[M]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University Press, 1988.[吴紫汪, 程国栋, 朱林楠, 等. 冻土路基工程[M]. 兰州:兰州大学出版社, 1988.]

[11] Xu Zhiying, Niu Fujun. Analysis of permafrost subgrade temperature in Qumar River region along Qinghai-Tibet Railway[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2011(3):5-8.[徐志英, 牛富俊. 青藏铁路楚玛尔河地区冻土路基地温状况分析[J]. 路基工程, 2011(3):5-8.]

[12] Sun Liangxin. Analysis of thermal stability of air-cooled rubble subgrade in Qumar River region along Qinghai-Tibet Railway[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2015, 34(3):34-39.[孙良鑫. 青藏铁路楚玛尔河地区片石气冷路基热稳定分析[J]. 兰州交通大学学报, 2015, 34(3):34-39.]

[13] Liu Lizhi, Liu Ling. Geologic Problems during construction of bridge along banks of Chumar river[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2003(2):56-58.[刘立志, 刘玲. 楚玛尔河沿岸桥梁施工中的地质问题[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2003(2):56-58.]

[14] Yin Guo'an, Niu Fujun, Lin Zhanju, et al. The distribution characteristics of permafrost along Qinghai-Tibet Railway and their response to environmental change[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(4):772-781.[尹国安, 牛富俊, 林战举, 等. 青藏铁路沿线多年冻土分布特征及其对环境变化的响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(4):772-781.]

[15] Mu Yanhu, Ma Wei, Niu Fujun, et al. Monitoring and analyzing the thermal conditions of traditional embankments along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(4):953-961.[穆彦虎, 马巍, 牛富俊, 等. 青藏铁路多年冻土区普通路基热状况监测分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(4):953-961.]

[16] Cheng Guodong, Jiang Hao, Wang Keli, et al. Thawing index and freezing index on the embankment surface in permafrost regions[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2003, 25(6):603-607.[程国栋, 江灏, 王可丽, 等. 冻土路基表面的融化指数与冻结指数[J]. 冰川冻土, 2003, 25(6):603-607.]

[17] Riseborough D W. Thawing and freezing indices in the active layer[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Permafrost. Rotterdam:AA Balkema, 2003, 2:953-958.

[18] Hu Zeyong, Qian Zeyu, Cheng Guodong, et al. Influence of solar radiation on embankment surface thermal regime of the Qinghai-Xizang Railway[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2002, 24(2):121-128.[胡泽勇, 钱泽雨, 程国栋, 等. 太阳辐射对青藏铁路路基表面热状况的影响[J]. 冰川冻土, 2002, 24(2):121-128.]

青藏工程走廊楚玛尔河高平原区路基边界温度特征

Boundary temperature features of the embankment in Qumar River region along the Qinghai-Tibet transportation engineering corridor

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	韩风雷, 张学富, 喻文兵, 韦良文, 周杰. 风积沙环境下高等级公路冻土块石路基降温性能分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3): 528-538.
[2]	李先明, 牛富俊, 刘华, 李安原, 牛永红, 许健, 林战举. 哈大高铁路基面冻胀变形特征及工程意义[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(1): 55-61.
[3]	张文清, 李承成, 刘德仁, 杨成, 牛亚强. 季节冻土区保温隔水路基防冻胀效果研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(6): 1258-1264.
[4]	王彦虎, 王旭, 杨楠, 王跃武, 张延杰. 钻孔埋管注盐法整治季节冻土区路基冻害现场试验研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(6): 1265-1272.
[5]	曹立. 我国季节冻土区路堑段路基水热特性及冻胀发展过程监测研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(5): 1065-1074.
[6]	易鑫, 胡达, 喻文兵, 刘伟博. 多年冻土区青藏公路路基边界温度及计算模型研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(2): 336-342.
[7]	王进昌, 吴青柏. 青藏铁路冻土区路桥过渡段沉降原因分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(1): 79-85.
[8]	牛富俊, 林战举, 吴旭阳, 商允虎, 李肖伦, 邵珠杰. 兰新客运专线浩门区间路基温度、水分及冻胀变形特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 1074-1082.
[9]	苏永奇, 马巍, 吴志坚, 马尔曼. 青藏工程走廊多年冻土场地地震动加速度峰值特征研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 1090-1098.
[10]	崔宏环, 刘建坤, 张立群, 李仲玉. 寒区路基改良土冻融循环与荷载耦合作用下损伤力学研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 1183-1188.
[11]	陆永港, 肖宏, 陈民子. 季节冻土区基床改性填料与保温护坡对路基温度场的影响分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 1059-1066.
[12]	王飞, 李国玉, 穆彦虎, 吴亚虎, 范善智. 干湿循环作用下压实黄土湿陷特性试验研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(2): 416-423.
[13]	吕菲. 季节冻土区高速铁路路基保温措施效果研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(1): 115-120.
[14]	曹伟, 陈继, 张波, 吴吉春, 李静, 盛煜. 青海柴木铁路多年冻土区片石路基工程措施效果的模糊评价[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(6): 1555-1562.
[15]	武立波, 祁伟, 牛富俊, 牛永红. 我国季节性冻土区公路路基冻害及其防治研究进展[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(5): 1283-1293.