软土固结系数刍议

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2016.0102

冰川冻土 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 904-908.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2016.0102

• 岩土本构模型与参数研究 • 上一篇下一篇

软土固结系数刍议

王吉利¹, 陈盼¹, 刘金龙², 韦昌富¹

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430071;
2. 合肥学院建筑工程系, 安徽合肥 230022

收稿日期:2016-01-31 修回日期:2016-07-09 出版日期:2016-08-25 发布日期:2016-09-19
作者简介:王吉利(1964-),男,安徽砀山人,副研究员,1991年在中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所获硕士学位,现从事岩土工程专业方面的实践与研究.E-mail:jlwang@whrsm.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（11302243；41306088）资助

Discussion on the coefficient of consolidation of soft soil

WANG Jili¹, CHEN Pan¹, LIU Jinlong², WEI Changfu¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China;
2. Department of Civil Engineering, Hefei University, Hefei 230022, China

Received:2016-01-31 Revised:2016-07-09 Online:2016-08-25 Published:2016-09-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在土的固结分析中，要正确估算土体中超静孔隙水压力的消散与沉降过程，重要的是确定可靠的固结系数C_v值.通过在天仙一级公路软弱地基路基工程沿线选择的二个试验场地上开展原位试验及室内试验，并结合珠江口某海区软土的固结试验数据，研究软土固结系数的规律，探讨其确定方法.研究表明：（1）由原位孔隙水压力消散试验得到的固结系数C_v值比室内高压固结试验时间平方根法所得到的相应值大一个数量级；（2）由室内高压固结试验时间平方根法所得到的固结系数C_v值大于时间对数法、反弯点法、三点法及司各脱法所得到的C_v值.（3）由于反弯点法、三点法及司各脱法确定固结系数C_v值有其各自的优点，在实际工程中均值得去尝试和推广.

关键词: 软土, 固结系数, 原位试验, 室内试验, 参数

Abstract: In analysis of soil consolidation, it is necessary to correctly estimate soil super static pore water pressure dissipation and settlement process, important is to determine the value of reliable consolidation coefficient C_v. In this paper, along the Tianmen-Xiantao Highway soft soil subgrade engineering choice of two test sites to carry out in-situ tests and laboratory tests, and combined with the data of soft soil consolidation tests in the Pearl River estuary. The law of consolidation coefficient of soft soil is studied, and the method of determining the coefficient of consolidation is discussed. Research shows that: (1) consolidation coefficient C_v values obtained by the in situ pore water pressure dissipation tests are an order of magnitude larger than the corresponding values obtained by the indoor high pressure consolidation test time square root method; (2) consolidation coefficient C_v values obtained by the indoor high pressure consolidation test time square root method are greater than the corresponding values obtained by the time logarithm method, the inflection point method, three point method and Scott method; (3) due to the inflection point method, three point method and Scott method determine the consolidation coefficient C_v value has its respective advantages, in practical engineering are worth to try and promote.

Key words: soft soil, coefficient of consolidation, in-situ tests, laboratory tests, parameter

中图分类号:

TU447

王吉利, 陈盼, 刘金龙, 韦昌富. 软土固结系数刍议[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 904-908.

WANG Jili, CHEN Pan, LIU Jinlong, WEI Changfu. Discussion on the coefficient of consolidation of soft soil[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2016, 38(4): 904-908.

参考文献

[1] Huang Wenxi. Engineering properties of soil[M]. Beijing: Water Conservancy and Electric Power Press, 1984: 130-148. [黄文熙. 土的工程性质[M]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1984: 130-148.]
[2] Qian Jiahuan, Yin Zongze. Principle and calculation of geotechnical engineering[M]. Beijing: Water Conservancy and Electric Power Press, 1996: 199-207. [钱家欢, 殷宗泽. 土工原理与计算[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1996: 199-207.]
[3] Yin Zongze. Status and prospects of soil mechanics development[J]. Journal of Hohai University, 1999, 27(1): 1-5. [殷宗泽. 土力学学科发展的现状与展望[J]. 河海大学学报, 1999, 27(1): 1-5.]
[4] Lin Peng, Xu Zhenhong, Xu Peng, et al. Research on coefficient of consolidation of soft clay under compression[J]. Rock and Soi1 Mechanics, 2003, 24(1): 106-112. [林鹏, 许镇鸿, 徐鹏, 等. 软土压缩过程中固结系数的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2003, 24(1): 106-112.]
[5] Deng Yongfeng, Liu Songyu, Ji Shuyue. Effect of sample disturbance on consolidation coefficient[J]. Rock and Soi1 Mechanics, 2007, 28(12): 2687-2690. [邓永锋, 刘松玉, 季署月. 取样扰动对固结系数的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(12): 2687-2690.]
[6] Zhou Jian, Yan Dongxiao, Jia Mincai, et al. Back analysis of consolidation coefficient of soils and prediction of long term post-load settlement of a deep-water port[J]. Rock and Soi1 Mechanics, 2008, 29(5): 1407-1410. [周健, 闫东霄, 贾敏才, 等. 某深水港土层固结系数反演及工后长期沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(5): 1407-1410.]
[7] Chen Yonghui, Zhou Jianhua, Cai Rui, et al. Consolidation behavior of soft foundation under embankment loads by considering the change of consolidation coefficient[J]. China Harbour Engineering, 2014(7): 23-26. [陈永辉, 周建华, 蔡锐, 等. 路堤荷载作用下考虑土体固结系数变化的软基固结规律[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2014(7): 23-26.]
[8] GB/T 50123-1999, Standard for soil test method[S]. [GB/T 50123-1999, 土工试验方法标准[S].]
[9] GB 50021-2001, Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering[S]. [GB 50021-2001, 岩土工程勘察规范[S].]
[10] Luo Liangping, Ding Jianwen. Comparisons of consolidation coefficients obtained from different methods[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University: Natural Sciences, 2014, 36(1): 42-45. [骆凉平, 丁建文. 不同固结系数计算方法之间的比较[J]. 三峡大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 36(1): 42-45.]
[11] Shi Gangqiang, Zhao Shiyun, Li Xianming, et al. The frost heaving deformation of high-speed railway subgrades in cold regions: monitoring and analyzing[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(2): 360-368. [石刚强, 赵世运, 李先明, 等. 严寒地区高速铁路路基冻胀变形监测分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(2): 360-368.]
[12] Wang Wenli, Wang Lanmin, Wang Qian. One-dimensional thawing consolidation behavior with periodical thermal boundary[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(4): 895-901. [王文丽, 王兰民, 王谦. 周期温度边界条件下一维融化固结特性研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(4): 895-901.]
[13] Zhen Yun, Ma Wei, Bing Hui. Impact of freezing and thawing cycles on the structures of soil and a quantitative approach[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2015, 37(1): 132-137. [郑郧, 马巍, 邴慧. 冻融循环对土结构性影响的机理与定量研究方法[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(1): 132-137.]

[1]	陈伏龙, 张婷, 冯平, 何新林, 李绍飞, 龙爱华. 融雪洪水跳跃变异对其参数估计不确定性影响分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(5): 1004-1015.
[2]	雷乐乐, 谢艳丽, 王大雁, 陈敦, 靳潇. 冻土静力学室内试验研究进展[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(4): 802-811.
[3]	姚亚锋, 荣传新, 程桦, 徐广舒. 深厚冲积层人工冻土蠕变参数的模糊遗传反演[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(3): 634-640.
[4]	黄星, 李东庆, 明锋, 邴慧, 彭万巍. 冻土的单轴抗压、抗拉强度特性试验研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(5): 1346-1352.
[5]	马强, 周凤玺, 刘云帅. 频域内饱和多孔介质的参数反演分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 898-903.
[6]	佘芳涛, 马纯阳, 张俊岱. 基于黄土结构损伤的地裂缝局部化破裂发展机制[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 1150-1156.
[7]	裴启涛, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 罗超文. 地应力与岩体模量关系的理论及试验研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(4): 889-897.
[8]	陈松, 陈剑, 刘宏, 马俊学. 堰塞湖溃坝堆积物的粒度特征及其沉积环境——以雪隆囊古堰塞湖为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(2): 509-516.
[9]	张乐乐, 赵林, 李韧, 高黎明, 肖瑶, 乔永平, 史健宗. 青藏高原唐古拉地区暖季土壤水分对地表反照率及其土壤热参数的影响[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(2): 351-358.
[10]	高冠龙, 张小由, 鱼腾飞, 赵虹, 邱燕, 李玉春. Shuttleworth-Wallace双源蒸散发模型阻力参数的确定[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(1): 170-177.
[11]	方潇雨, 李忠勤, Bernd Wuennemann, 高抒, 陈仁升. 冰川物质平衡模式及其对比研究——以祁连山黑河流域十一冰川研究为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(2): 336-350.
[12]	李东阳, 刘波, 刘念, 马永君, 王莉. 缩短核磁共振测定冻土未冻水含量实验时间的方法[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(6): 1502-1507.
[13]	刘新华, 徐海量, 凌红波, 翟新博, 赵新风, 戴岳. 阿克苏河源流区径流量与降水量丰枯变化和相关性研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(3): 741-750.
[14]	尹晓文, 傅强, 马昆林. 冻土三轴蠕变非线性数学模型研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(1): 171-176.
[15]	张伟, 王根绪, 周剑, 刘光生, 王一博. 基于CoupModel的青藏高原多年冻土区土壤水热过程模拟[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(5): 1099-1109.

软土固结系数刍议

Discussion on the coefficient of consolidation of soft soil

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0