现浇混凝土-冻土接触面冻结强度直剪试验研究

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2017.0011

冰川冻土 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 86-91.doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2017.0011

现浇混凝土-冻土接触面冻结强度直剪试验研究

吉延峻^1,2,3, 贾昆⁴, 俞祁浩¹, 金会军¹, 郭磊¹, 罗晓晓¹

1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院冻土工程国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 中国能源建设集团甘肃省电力设计院有限公司, 甘肃兰州 730050;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
4. 国家电网青海省电力公司, 青海西宁 810008

收稿日期:2016-09-10 修回日期:2016-12-18 出版日期:2017-02-25 发布日期:2017-06-03
作者简介:吉延峻(1979-),男,陕西延安人,高级工程师,2008年在中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所获硕士学位,现为中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院在读博士研究生,从事工程勘察、冻土力学及寒区工程研究.E-mail:59772029@qq.com.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41471061）；国家科技支撑计划项目（2014BAG05B03）；中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所STS项目（HHS-TSS-STS-1502）资助

Direct shear tests of freezing strength at the interface between cast-in-situ concrete and frozen soil

JI Yanjun^1,2,3, JIA Kun⁴, YU Qihao¹, JIN Huijun¹, GUO Lei¹, LUO Xiaoxiao¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Gansu Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd, Energy China, Lanzhou 730050, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. Qinghai Electric Power Company, State Grid Corporation of China, Xining 810008, China

Received:2016-09-10 Revised:2016-12-18 Online:2017-02-25 Published:2017-06-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 关于混凝土-冻土接触面的力学强度研究多集中于预制成型混凝土样（块）与冻土接触面的力学试验研究，而与工程实际更为接近的冻土中现浇混凝土、冻结稳定后混凝土-冻土接触面的力学强度研究则少有涉及。基于冻土中现浇混凝土的试验方式，开展了不同水灰比、含冰量及冻土温度条件下，混凝土-冻土复杂接触面冻结强度的直剪试验研究。结果表明：试验条件下，由于混凝土中粗、细骨料导热系数及水化热侵蚀强度不同，冻土中现浇混凝土会导致混凝土-冻土接触面发生起伏变化。受该因素影响，粗糙接触面较光滑接触面的冻结强度增大71.9%。粗糙接触面引起的应力集中，使得剪应力在剪切破坏过程中出现间歇性增大、跳跃。在冻结强度构成中，随接触面粗糙程度的增大， φ值对冻结强度增长的贡献要大于c值。水灰比由0.4增至0.6，混凝土导热系数降低，生成接触面趋于光滑，冻结强度减小；土体含水量由15%增大至30%时，冻结强度增大，含水量继续增大至40%时，冻结强度减小；在不同温度条件下，整体呈现冻土温度降低冻结强度相应增大的趋势。基于上述结果，多年冻土区灌注桩设计时，建议混凝土采用0.4~0.5水灰比。

关键词: 现浇混凝土, 冻土, 直剪试验, 接触面, 冻结强度, 剪应力

Abstract: Previous experimental study of interface strength between concrete pile and frozen soil has focused more on the mechanical properties of the interface between precast concrete block or specimen and frozen soil with less information about direct shear test of freezing strength between cast-in-situ concrete and frozen soil. Based on a new specimen preparation method, a series of laboratory direct shear tests of the interface between cast-in-situ and frozen soil were performed. The results show that because of difference in thermal parameters of concrete, the interface between cast-in-situ concrete and frozen soil appears irregular model. Freezing strength of rough interface will increase by 71.9% as compared with that of smooth interface. Stress concentration occurs on the rough interface, resulting in stress intermittently increasing and jumping in the shear failure process. With the increase of roughness at the interface, φ contribution increase more than c contribution increase by degree. Thus φ can play more important role in the growth of freezing strength. When water cement ratio increases from 0.4 to 0.6, with the thermal conductivity of concrete decreasing, the interface becomes smoother and the freezing strength will decrease; when water content increases from 15% to 30%, freezing strength will increase first and then decrease; when water content increases to 40%, freezing strength will decrease. Thus, it is recommended that 0.4~0.5 is a reasonable water cement ratio, according to this study.

Key words: cast-in-situ concrete, frozen soil, direct shear test, interface, freezing strength, shear-stress

中图分类号:

P642.14/TU411.7

吉延峻, 贾昆, 俞祁浩, 金会军, 郭磊, 罗晓晓. 现浇混凝土-冻土接触面冻结强度直剪试验研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(1): 86-91.

JI Yanjun, JIA Kun, YU Qihao, JIN Huijun, GUO Lei, LUO Xiaoxiao. Direct shear tests of freezing strength at the interface between cast-in-situ concrete and frozen soil[J]. JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 2017, 39(1): 86-91.

参考文献

[1] Wang Guoshang, Yu Qihao, Guo Lei, et al. Prevention and control of freezing and thawing disasters in electric transmission lines constructed in permafrost regions[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(1):137-143.[王国尚, 俞祁浩, 郭磊, 等. 多年冻土区输电线路冻融灾害防控研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(1):137-143.]
[2] Ruan Guofeng, Zhang Jianming, Chai Mingtang. Risk division of thaw settlement hazard along Qinghai-Tibet engineering corridor under climate change[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(4):811-817.[阮国峰, 张建明, 柴明堂. 气候变化情景下青藏工程走廊融沉灾害风险性区划研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(4):811-817.]
[3] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Code for design of soil and foundation of building in frozen soil region (JGJ 5118-2011)[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2011:52-57.[中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部中华人民共和国建设部. 冻土地区建筑地基基础设计规范(JGJ 118-2011)[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011:52-57.]
[4] National Energy Administration. Technical code for foundation design of overhead transmission line in frozen soil region (DL/T 5501-2015)[S]. Beijing:China Electric Power Press, 2015:15-20.[国家能源局. 冻土区架空输电线路基础设计技术规程(DL/T 5501-2015)[S]. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2015:15-20.]
[5] Penner E, Gold L W. Transfer of heaving force by adfreezing to columns and foundation walls in frostsusceptible soils[J]. Canadian Geotechincal Journal, 1971, 8(4):514-526.
[6] Sadovsikiy A V. Adfreeze between ground and foundation materials[C]//Proceedings of 2th International Permafrost Conference, Yakutsk, 1973:650-653.
[7] Perameswaran V R. Creep of model piles in frozen soils[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1979, 16(1):69-77.
[8] Chen Xiaobai, Liu Jiankun, Liu Hongxu, et al. Frost action of soil and foundation engineering[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2006:284-296.[陈肖柏, 刘建坤, 刘洪绪, 等. 土的冻结作用与地基[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2006:284-296.]
[9] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Technical code for building pile foundations (JGJ 94-2008)[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2008:102-114.[中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部中华人民共和国建设部. 建筑桩基础技术规范(JGJ 94-2008)[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2008:102-114.]
[10] Lu Peng, Liu Jiankun. An experimental study on direct shear tests of frozen soil-concrete interface[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2015, 37(2):106-110.[吕鹏, 刘建坤. 冻土与混凝土接触面直剪试验研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2015, 37(2):106-110.]
[11] Dong Shengshi, Dong Lanfeng, Wen Zhi, et al. Study of constitutive relation of interface between frozen Qinghai-Tibet silt and concrete[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(6):1629-1633.[董盛时, 董兰凤, 温智, 等. 青藏冻结粉土与混凝土基础接触面本构关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(6):1629-1633.]
[12] Wen Zhi, Yu Qihao, Zhang Jianming, et al. Experimental study on adfreezing bond strength of interface between silt and foundation of Qinghai-Tibetan transmission line[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(12):2262-2267.[温智, 俞祁浩, 张建明, 等. 青藏直流输变电工程基础冻结强度试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(12):2262-2267.]
[13] Chen Zhaoyu, Li Guoyu, Mu Yanhu, et al. Impact of molding temperature and hydration heat of concrete on thermal propertied of pipe foundation in permafrost regions along the Qinghai-Tibet DC Transmission Line[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(4):818-827.[陈赵育, 李国玉, 穆彦虎, 等. 混凝土的入模温度和水化热对青藏直流输电线路冻土桩基温度特性的影响[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(4):818-827.]
[14] Lei Guo, Yu Qihao, Li Xiaoning, et al. Refreezing of cast-in-place piles under various engineering conditions[J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2015, 7(4):376-383.
[15] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Specification for mix proportion design of ordinary concrete (JGJ 55-2011)[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2011:20-22.[中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 普通混凝土配合比设计规程(JGJ 55-2011)[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011:20-22.]
[16] Yi Xiangsheng, Yin Yanyu, Li Guosheng, et al. Temperature variation in recent 50 years in the three-river headwaters region of Qinghai Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(11):1451-1465.[易湘生, 尹衍雨, 李国胜, 等. 青海三江源地区近50年来的气温变化[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(11):1451-1465.]
[17] Xu Xiaozu, Wang Jiacheng, Zhang Lixin. Physics of frozen soil[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:Science Press, 2010:75-90.[徐斅祖, 王家澄, 张立新. 冻土物理学[M]. 2版. 北京:科学出版社, 2010:75-90.]
[18] He Shiming, An Wenhua, Luo Faqian, et al. Study on heat conductivity coefficient of cement slurry and drilling fluids[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2007, 27(4):53-55.[何世明, 安文华, 骆发前, 等. 水泥浆与泥浆热导率的测定研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2007, 27(4):53-55.]
[19] Ma Wei, Wang Dayan. Mechanics of frozen ground[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2014:146-150.[马巍, 王大雁. 冻土力学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014:146-150.]
[20] Xiao Jianzhuang, Song Zhiwen, Zhang Feng. An experimental study on thermal conductivity of concrete[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2010, 13(1):17-22.[肖建庄, 宋志文, 张枫. 混凝土导热系数试验与分析[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2010, 13(1):17-22.]
[21] Liu Weidong, Tian Bo, Hou Ziyi. Experimental study on thermal conductivity of concrete[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2012, 22(1):226-229.[刘卫东, 田波, 侯子义. 混凝土导热系数试验研究[J]. 中外公路, 2012, 22(1):226-229.]
[22] Chen Xiaobai, Liu Jiankun, Liu Hongxu, et al. Frost action of soil and foundation engineering[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2006:288-294.[陈肖柏, 刘建坤, 刘洪绪, 等. 土的冻结作用与地基[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2006:288-294.]
[23] Wu Ziwang, Ma Wei. Strength and creep of frozen soil[M]. Lanzhou:Lan Zhou University Press, 1994:98-105.[吴紫汪, 马巍. 冻土强度与蠕变[M]. 兰州:兰州大学出版社, 1994:98-105.]
[24] Zhang Wen, Zhang Weihong, Pan Qilai. Factors affecting intension of the aged frozen earth[J]. Journal of Qinghai University (Nature Science), 2005, 23(4):26-29.[张文, 张卫红, 潘起来. 青藏高原多年冻土冻结强度的影响因素[J]. 青海大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 23(4):26-29.]

现浇混凝土-冻土接触面冻结强度直剪试验研究

Direct shear tests of freezing strength at the interface between cast-in-situ concrete and frozen soil

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王宏磊, 孙志忠, 刘永智, 武贵龙. 青藏铁路多年冻土区含融化夹层路基的热状态[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(5): 934-942.
[2]	赵全宁, 严应存, 刘彩红, 祁栋林, 铁吉新. 1980-2017年青海省玉树地区季节冻土变化对气候变暖的响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(5): 899-906.
[3]	吴金权, 辛洋洋, 徐文玺, 孙田. 热棒在根拉公路岛状多年冻土路基工程中的应用研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(5): 943-950.
[4]	李双洋, 牛富俊, 孙志忠, 石梁宏. 多年冻土区姜路岭隧道施工水热力数值研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(5): 966-973.
[5]	高志华, 赵昭, 曾辉辉, 田威. 改进的无网格法及其在冻土区桩基温度场中的应用[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(5): 974-978.
[6]	孙弘哲, 马大龙, 臧淑英, 吴祥文. 大兴安岭多年冻土区不同林型土壤微生物群落特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(5): 1028-1036.
[7]	刘亚丽, 王俊峰, 吴青柏. 多年冻土区线性工程的生态环境影响研究现状与展望[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(4): 728-737.
[8]	訾凡, 杨更社, 贾海梁. 饱和度对泥质粉砂岩冻结力学性质的影响[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(4): 748-755.
[9]	王陆阳, 吴青柏, 蒋观利. 风沙堆积对下伏多年冻土影响的数值模拟[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(4): 738-747.
[10]	雷乐乐, 谢艳丽, 王大雁, 陈敦, 靳潇. 冻土静力学室内试验研究进展[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(4): 802-811.
[11]	邵珠杰. 高海拔季节冻土区高速铁路路基水-热-冻胀变形特征研究——以兰新客专民乐段为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3): 588-597.
[12]	马素辉, 牟翠翠, 郭红, 张现凯, 栗泽苑, 张廷军. 祁连山黑河上游多年冻土区不同植被类型土壤有机碳密度分布特征[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3): 426-433.
[13]	尤明东, 李海波, 葛敏, 臧淑英. 黑龙江省冻土活动层厚度年际变化影响因素分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3): 480-491.
[14]	韩风雷, 张学富, 喻文兵, 韦良文, 周杰. 风积沙环境下高等级公路冻土块石路基降温性能分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3): 528-538.
[15]	郭雪鸾, 齐吉琳, 党博翔, 董兆仁. 高温冻结砂土温度界限试验研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3): 539-545.